- Joined
- 21 Nov 2004
- Posts
- 46,106
Same here, didn’t realise there were hostile settlements.
Is the story that bad?!
Out of curiosity, but when do you start getting some decent loot ?? All I'm mostly getting is grey stuff still at lvl 11. Also wondering is there any more hoods dropping the higher level you get, or just helmets ?? Don't really like the look of any helmets, prefer the hood really. In worse case have to upgrade stuff but cost tons of resources, which is needed for the ship as most know. So just wondering if the above happens as you get higher level or just random pot luck ?
I wouldn't touch upgrading with a barge pole unless you REALLY need it or have a legendary that you want to carry with you.
Frankly, I'm starting to miss the purely cosmetic armour of Origins, upgrades are too expensive and there is gear I really like but I'm forced to switch out as it only makes sense to upgrade every 10 levels or so... Thankfully, I'm only a level behind on my Snake set because it scaled up once I got the last piece.
Regarding Conquest Battles - I always pick the side that gives 2x Epic rewards. Sometimes, even though I am victorious with said side I still get 1x bit of Epic and sometimes I'll get the full 2x pieces. Confused as to why this happens?
You shouldn't be able to sell or dismantle Legendary (gold stuff)...
I am lucky that I do have time to play it in small bursts. The more I do though, the more I realise there is a LOT of stuff missing that enhanced Origins a great deal. Sometimes I can't help but get frustrated by the lack of things, like the myterious npc canoe man who appears in the middle of a lake just when I need transport etc. Origins was a lot more detailed in it's worldscape too.
I picked up the game on Sunday (first time on any Assasin's Creed game actually) and I'm really enjoying it so far. So much so that I'm likely to go into their back catalogue and play some of the earlier versions. Before I impulse buy, are the predecessors similar? I can see some comments on here about Origins being more "detailed" which seems good to me so that's almost a certainty to get, but are any others similar in the open world assassin type theme?
Before anyone asks I played the first AC for about 10 minutes and assumed it was action RPG with a heavy focus on combat. But I love proper stealth mechanics and this is scratching that itch well.
Still amazed at the amount of content in the game. Only just opened up the Cultist menu....whole new raft of stuff to do in there!
Odyssey is an extremely adept name. There's so much in the game I really feel like I'm making up my own story as I go my own way. When I sit down to play, I'm like hmmm shall I do some bounties? See how high I can get my bounty? Hunt mercenaries? Go hunting cultists? Try and flip a region to start a conquest? Do some sailing? Go explore a new island? Main story quest? Hunting quest? Just explore random ?s on the map. Pick up world quests? Message board quests?
Pretty sure I'll be playing this until the next game comes round
Nice summary, I hadn't realised there had be so many by now! Origins sounds like a definite in that case, may try to look a bit at some gameplay videos of the others.
Stupid games making me spend money...
The thing that gets me is these 'reviewers' are from what I can read complaining the world map is too big?????? and there are too many quests????
Poison doesn't seem to do much for me... doesn't do much damage and certainly doesn't seem to affect the enemies armour that much as they still seem to take similar amounts of damage.
Fire on the other hand seems to do lots of damage with the caveat it can burn you as well (easily fixed with a quick dive and roll).
Anyone else know what is up with the Poison/Intoxicated effects?
Shawrey
I'm on the fence about buying this. How similar to The Witcher 3 (I know, I know) is it, in terms of scale and depth? The reviews seem to slam the levelling system with many commentators indicating that even enemies one level above your own are really hard work. Other than IGN giving it very high marks, most reviews seem to be in the 'Recommended' band rather than the 'Must Buy' band.
Thoughts?
Thinking of buying this but it would be my first Assassins Creed game? Loved the Witcher 3. Do you need to have played any of the previous AC?
Funnily enough, its essentially this reason as to why I put Origins and Odyssey above Witcher 3. Since playing Origins, I've gone back and tried to play Witcher 3 but its the lack of parkour since playing Origins, that kills it for me. I didnt really notice it the first time I played Witcher 3 when it originally came out but going back I just find myself getting irritated that my uber monster slaying super fit , highly combatant Witcher cant climb up a wall or cliff-face or leap up to a building and jump from roof to roof. So despite W3 having the edge on questing I actually find AC Origins + Odyssey simply more fun to play.
Well, I took the plunge and after it refusing to load from start up - apparently, MSI afterburner is the issue at launch but not when you load the game and then run it after that, so WTF - and after some tedious UPlay or whatever, the game is actually very, very fun. Like, REALLY fun. I have no idea how the map works which is annoying me because this is my first AC and I'm sure it is ingrained in not-new-to-series-players but I've got zero idea where to go and the indicators are awful.
Also took me a while to realise that the reason I can't jump is because I can go up vertically. This is SO much fun and unexpected. Oh, see thing in distance? Just climb all of those things and go there! So liberating.
Graphics are good, character (Kass) is great so far, lip-synch is meh, sense of scale is large. For anyone else on the cusp like I was earlier, dive in