Because of the hypocrisy of supporting the so called "politics of envy" only when they agree with you?
No, simply because you dont know what I would think about any given situation?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/504c0/504c01027866aa22f96a5f2d3e8b91463e55ad81" alt="Confused :confused: :confused:"
Because of the hypocrisy of supporting the so called "politics of envy" only when they agree with you?
Lot of the posters posting stuff werent born or very young under the Iron Lady. I was 6 when she left office.
I throw the balls up and Biohazard always hits them - it's dead easy.
It isn't mistruth from the Stoke On Trent area, you have your experiences where you live and I have mine and I shared my life with many miners who agreed years on and blamed Scargill (obviously some don't).
I worked at The Michelin Tyre Company which was also a 'closed shop' to family members and then I went to Creda/Hotpoint which was a bit more relaxed but if you had family you definitely got on. Stoke On Trent's miners were no different but the difference was the ***Millionaires wages*** (3 asterisks per side to exaggerate even more) which they didn't deserve next to the other working men they shared their lives with.
Yes they had their own estates - Colville (spelling intentional) was a dead giveaway and basically made up of Geordie miners as was Lundy estate.
No, simply because you dont know what I would think about any given situation?![]()
So you wouldn't disagree with someone that said being jealous of bankers high wages is just the politics of envy? Because if you do, then it is somewhat hypocritical to accuse others of the same when applied to a different workforce.![]()
Your acolytes deal in facts mate, you're messing it up for them with these tales of old Stoke which serve no purpose really.
But hang on, they've been confirmed by other posters, so they serve all the purpose they intend.![]()
So you wouldn't disagree with someone that said being jealous of bankers high wages is just the politics of envy? Because if you do, then it is somewhat hypocritical to accuse others of the same when applied to a different workforce.![]()
Your acolytes deal in facts mate, you're messing it up for them with these tales of old Stoke which serve no purpose really.
I'll give you more facts.
When I left school in 1974 it was a certainty that having in excess of 20 family members at the Michelin (I come from a very large ***** family) I would get an Apprenticeship but I wouldn't get an Apprenticeship at a pit because I had no family members at any so it was useless trying. Even in 74 I was getting £16/week but the mining Apprentices in our College class were on 4x what we earned.
In the early 90s when t'pits were shutting down in Stoke On Trent the three companies Creda, JCB and Michelin put the Miners at the top of the list to employ (which was unfair) and it was then when these ex-miners realised how much they had been molly coddled. Many had to downsize their houses and cars because they were now on proper working mans wages.
Is there anyone who lives North or West of Watford who thinks she was alright?
Is there anyone who lives North or West of Watford who thinks she was alright?
I think it is a lot more complex than "She was evil" or "She was great". I don't think she killed industry (probably because I am aware of how much high value industry the UK has), though she did switch off the life support for plenty of otherwise failing industries. Her main failure was not switching off the tap but on providing no backup after she did it. I think the miners are more responsible for the closing of the pits than Thatcher and would say that the unions were too powerful and needed dealing with. I also find it somewhat amusing the differing standards when it comes to evidence depending on if it agrees with their point of view or not.![]()
Can't believe there is a party in George Sq Glasgow to celebrate her death, really embarrassing.