Soldato
- Joined
- 8 Mar 2007
- Posts
- 10,938
I'm not sure. My stance has always been that miners could be perceived as greedy by others due to their actions. I stand by my comments that I believe some were. The widely reported reason for going on strike was mine closures, but in the background there were also issues such as an overtime ban and wages.
Don't also forget this was one of the first ever strikes over job losses. Seems strange now but before 1984 strikes were always about pay/conditions.
Miners had been made redundant before without strikes, the Labour Government (guided by none-other than Tony Benn) sacked thousands of workers in the 70s when they merged many of the UK's industries.
That's why the miner's argument seemed a little hypocritical. They weren't worried about jobs when they knew there was a good chance only a few would be sacked and the rest would keep theirs, but as soon as entire pit closures came over the horizon suddenly is was all for one and one for all.
They were happy with divide and rule when it meant keeping over-inflated wages in their little club and suddenly started fighting it when their jobs were threatened.
My overall opinion is the strike was unreasonable and a result of Scargill (I think he is on record) refusing any closures for any reason other than safety or coal exhaustion. In a way I suppose that was his job, but it was exactly this kind of dogged resistance that was throttling our industries and why were being left behind by our foreign counterparts.
Make no mistake about it Scargill wanted a revolution and a socialist over-throw of the government. He even went on Parkinson to outline how his new 'society' would function and what it would look like. Towards the end of the dispute he was desperately shouting to ever-dwindling audiences how the 'revolution' was still on and how they could still bring down Westminster. The miner strike was more about bringing down the government than protecting miner's jobs.
Scargill's problem was he under-estimated Thatcher and she outwitted him. Unbeknownst to him, Maggie had stockpiled two year's worth of coal for the country so his strikes actually had very little effect on the running of the country. The longer it went on and the general public realised that it wasn't affecting their lives the more people started to ask "do we really need them at all". Once the public were totally onside with the government, it was game over for the miners.
Last edited: