anyone heard much on the map size of aftermath, @ cq247 we have a 64 man and a 32 man sever. im thinking my 32 man which is used for metro at the min would work best???
Speaking to DICE Producer Craig Mcleod, I was informed that fans can expect similar map sizes to the ones included in the Back to Karkand expansion with a good mix of vehicle and infantry combat.
anyone heard much on the map size of aftermath, @ cq247 we have a 64 man and a 32 man sever. im thinking my 32 man which is used for metro at the min would work best???
Been checking the connection speeds on my two rigs tonight after speaking to a bt customer support adviser, results below using speedtest.net.
Old i7 930 system.
ping, 125ms
dl, 5.9mbps
ul, 0.38mbps
i5 3570k, (my gaming setup)
ping, 126ms
dl, 1.93
ul, 0.10
Both rigs are connected via ethernet cable to a netgear dg834pn 108mbps adsl router. Once ive downloaded the updates for the bf3 account on the other rig, im gonna see how different it performs compared to my main account on the spec in sig.
You forgot pot heads
32 player servers are better than 64 in my experience for Conquest Domination, Conquest, Large Conquest, Team Deathmatch and Rush, 64 player servers makes it feel like everyone is crammed into a server, so i go for 32 player servers.
cq247.co.uk sign up and have a look around. We have a busy ts during the evening filled with posh retards, Irish potatos, ex-cons and some old people.
You forgot pot heads
Never used to be as bad as this tbh, seems to have got worse after changing to the new spec in sig, (previously had an i7 920) though i havent changed any network or router settings. Bit baffling tbh. Ran speedtest on my laptop, (wireless connected) results at.Setter those pings are terrible, def something wrong. I get 80 ping playing on UK servers from Moscow on a 4MB connectionIf i play local my ping is 15.
Anyone up for a game tonight? Might jump on CQ247