Battlefield 3 thread - Server details in opening post -

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sin_Chase said:
Maybe you should try different weapons and load outs depending on the map and other players?

Seemingly all you use is LMG and 2 different Assault weapons. You rarely use any vehicles, and when you do it's tanks only. Add to this you have not bothered with any of the un-lockables via assignments.

It's no wonder you don't like the game, you only play 10% of what it offers.
Click to expand...

You have completely misunderstood my point. The reason i don't like that game, is because it is an unbalance mess, teams are not being balanced often enough, so for every great round that you have, you will have 10 bad ones, where you will get your ass kicked or win by comfortable distance, we are talking about a couple of hundred points.

And I don't like the game, because I am only using one class and a few weapons, I know full well that I am not using a lot of the stuff offered, simply because I prefer playing on foot, to cap objectives and I prefer the support class, because I think it is the best overall class for my playing style and I find it the most fun to play.

I could use all the game, vehicles and guns, but it would not suddenly balance the game out. If the game is unbalanced, it is due to the players on one team not being good enough, yet the game itself does nothing about it. It should be mandatory, for the game to get balanced in the beginning of a new round, based on how the previous round went.

Half the time, even if you do find a balanced server, players leave after a game and the game that was balanced a round ago, is now unbalanced. But instead of taking 1 round to balance things out, you can quite easily play 10 rounds, where one team is much superior before actually any auto balance kicks in.
 
Well it works both ways, if the server isnt balanced people complain
but all our servers are balance though out the game and at the end of every round
but people still complain that they have been balanced to the loosing team :D
 
_lecro_ said:
Well it works both ways, if the server isnt balanced people complain
but all our servers are balance though out the game and at the end of every round
but people still complain that they have been balanced to the loosing team :D
Click to expand...

I think Lecro, you are barking up the wrong tree if you think sense or reality will sway his view.
 
JGStonedRaider said:
I think Lecro, you are barking up the wrong tree if you think sense or reality will sway his view.
Click to expand...

Wow, so to you, it makes more sense not balancing teams out? Really lol :D

Yeah lets do that, lets have teams that have 64 players of lvl 80+ against a team of 32 players all level 10 or below.

That really should be great fun. Lets make it even better, so that every level that you level up, you do 1% more damage. This would be great fun going after low level players, makes the game so much fairer.:rolleyes:
 
_lecro_ said:
Well it works both ways, if the server isnt balanced people complain
but all our servers are balance though out the game and at the end of every round
but people still complain that they have been balanced to the loosing team :D
Click to expand...

Well then you're playing with idiots. If people are complaining because they are being moved about, so that the game remains as balanced as possible, well then they are idiots.

What is the point in playing a competitive multiplayer game, if the game is not competitive? Remember the good old days of BF2, the base rapeing as they used to call it. Man that was great fun. :rolleyes:

At least they managed to fix that in BF3.
 
This game causes me to RAGE like no other!

Being killed by a pistol at the range of a sniper
Nobody repairing your tank/vehicle at request of repair

Probably rage quit 3 times last night!

Battlefield bad company 2 never did this, should've kept with client side as well

elmuzzy66. said:
I bet you it's dg doing the ddos just trolling Neil for getting premium:D
Click to expand...

I feel ripped off that I spent £20, should've listened to my gut instinct but our clan was playing it and not warz :(
 
MissChief said:
I rage when I'm running after a smoking tank with my repair torch out and they drive away or keep moving.
Click to expand...

This!

I'm like fuuuuu!!!

To be honest the whole game is a million times better in a decent squad on voice comms. I rarely play it any other way to be honest.
 
Neil79 said:
This game causes me to RAGE like no other!

Being killed by a pistol at the range of a sniper
Nobody repairing your tank/vehicle at request of repair

Probably rage quit 3 times last night!

Battlefield bad company 2 never did this, should've kept with client side as well



I feel ripped off that I spent £20, should've listened to my gut instinct but our clan was playing it and not warz :(
Click to expand...

It was just as bad on BFBC2 mate.
 
Guru said:
This!

I'm like fuuuuu!!!

To be honest the whole game is a million times better in a decent squad on voice comms. I rarely play it any other way to be honest.
Click to expand...

Agree. But how can they get people to support each other on public servers?

I had the idea of not giving any stats for k/d ratio, and only given points based on things you do in the game, like supporting team mates and objectives.

(I suppose kills would get points, if it was defending or attacking an objective etc...)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom