For reviewing hardware such as CPUs and Graphics cards, should we put much emphasis on Benchmark results? On the one hand, benchmarks are needed to properly compare products to each other. However, all the reviewers will have different PCs, and likely overclocked by different ammounts, so we can't get a set benchmark system going, and most of us will not have several CPUs/Graphics cards to swap around to benchmark and compare.
I would be able to run a couple of benchmarks for things like 3dmark, furmark and the like, but I'm not sure if I should include them without having anything to properly compare the results with. IMO, numbered benchmarks like that are probably best left to the more busiuness oriented review sites like Toms Hardware and so on, since they have one base system that they can test everything with, just changing the graphics card or CPU around and thus providing results that can be easily compared.
Or will OcUK be shipping all their reviewers a complimentary 'Ultima Eliminator' PC so they are all reviewing from the same base PC?