No you just don't do it at all.Shut up, you have to take your chance. It was a poor move but you don't wait until lap 35.
No you just don't do it at all.Shut up, you have to take your chance. It was a poor move but you don't wait until lap 35.
Webber was **** though
Shut up, you have to take your chance. It was a poor move but you don't wait until lap 35.
lol, it won't happen, do you know why. Vettel cheated against his team mate, he got team orders multiple times, and as WE ALL SAID THE WHOLE TIME.... Vettel just isn't a very good driver. He rarely makes brilliant over takes, he's a boring driver, it's not that he won, it's that he won in a truly superior car, taking advantage of team orders while not looking that good.
The car is behind at the moment and Ricciardo has been ridiculously good to watch, he's been involved in multiple brilliant over takes, he's faster, he's a better driver. He's great to watch, which is why so many people like Alonso and Hamilton, not because he's english or because of who he is, because he's exciting to watch.
Vettel isn't exciting to watch by and large(everyone has an exciting race now and then), Button isn't good to watch, Rosberg gets beaten by most when on level pegging, with all the advantages better drivers keep him behind or get ahead of him all the time. He's one of the more exciting drivers out there still but he's clearly not at that top level.
Alonso beats Hamilton loads over the past several years..... yet we all like him.
It's almost like all the really exciting drivers are liked highly and the boring drivers who rely on cheating/team orders or pure luck(while being beaten often when not having luck). The boring drivers are called boring, when they are boring, regardless of if they are winning or not.
How many people questioned how good Vettel really was because you know, we could watch him and see a lack of top notch quality, just in a top car against a poor team mate. How many others went "4 titles, he's clearly the bestest"... who was right?
Who are great drivers is really easy to spot, I like multiple direct rivals to Hamilton across the past 6 years, and dislike the boring drivers, rival or not.
No you just don't do it at all.
Not really though is it, Vettel's a very good driver and he's proved it time and time again.Well said.
Quite clearly they don't have pro German bias.
tbh the only time vettel is exciting to watch is if hes being caught and makes a mistake
Vettel was loved and very popular on here prior to his first world title. He was also good to watch.
The forum's heavily biased towards Hamilton...Watching the replays, is this as bad an incident as everyone seems to think it is?
The contact didn't seem too bad.
Everyone clearly wants some rope and a Nico to pop his head through a noose, but could the same contact have caused zero damage, or next to none and not effected the result of the race?
Maybe I am missing the issue, but it seems a massive overreaction from everyone against Nico.
Great interview by Lewis....
The forum's heavily biased towards Hamilton...
Watching the replays, is this as bad an incident as everyone seems to think it is?
The contact didn't seem too bad.
Everyone clearly wants some rope and a Nico to pop his head through a noose, but could the same contact have caused zero damage, or next to none and not effected the result of the race?
Maybe I am missing the issue, but it seems a massive overreaction from everyone against Nico.
The forum's heavily biased towards Hamilton...
Agreed.Exactly, the BBC team are saying it's acceptable if it's late in the race. No it isn't. It doesn't matter on lap 2 or 35 if you lose a result for the team. Eddie and Lauda saying otherwise is just BS.