HahaRoswell... it's turning into a conspiracy theory
HahaRoswell... it's turning into a conspiracy theory
They can only ban him if Wolff/Lauder admit what was said in the meeting. I can't see that happening as it would hurt Mercedes.
So Rosberg has effectively admitted to causing an incident deliberately. Do we really think any penalty will be imposed? (personally, no).
Agree. Hamilton should've just kept quiet and let the team deal with it although he seemed to think the team would ignore it in his interview earlier which wasn't a very bright thing to say either. They now have to confirm what he said and hurt Rosberg or deny what's been said and leave Hamilton out to dry.But at the same time we have a situation where if Wolff and Lauda do not corroborate Hamiltons story, it could hurt the relationship with Hamilton even further.
I have never seen anyone on here or anywhere ever say Senna didn't deserve a title because he was a cheat and so his title was flawed and senna admitted he did it on purpose.
Yet I have never seen anyone say "well actually senna only won 2 titles as he cheated for one of them"
No one cares, no one says Schumacher actually won 6 and Hill 2.
Nothing he said in that post is wrong though.Yea okay.
Keep calling things wrong and not seeing for how it is.
If I was Rosberg after hearing the childish and unprofessional outbursts of lauda and Wolfe I would be thinking why bother racing for the team and race for myself. Quite clearly the Mercedes management are not up to running a team...
until we hear it from the horses mouth, its just gossip
What, I've never seen team managers respond well to team mate collisions, ever, their responses were professional. They didn't call out Rosberg totally nor scold him, they said it was unacceptable, it was unacceptable. Pretending it didn't happen would have been unprofessional.
Yea okay.
Keep calling things wrong and not seeing for how it is. Let your bias keep getting in the way.
Which bias would that be?
Ok how about you show me someone recently saying Senna didn't deserve his last title and he cheated. I can't think of a single time on here where anyone has called his 1990 a "losers title" as you called it if Rosberg wins.
It's a good thing McLaren and Ferrari haven't confirmed drivers yet, as there's bound to be a seat opened at Mercedes, and given the tone of Wolff and Lauda today, I suspect the Mercedes lawyers are currently in the process of shredding Rosberg's contract.
I'll go out on a limb - Rosberg to replace Button again.
It's a good thing McLaren and Ferrari haven't confirmed drivers yet, as there's bound to be a seat opened at Mercedes, and given the tone of Wolff and Lauda today, I suspect the Mercedes lawyers are currently in the process of shredding Rosberg's contract.
I'll go out on a limb - Rosberg to replace Button again..
If I was Hamilton I wouldn't want Rosberg sacked. Why would you want a driver that 95 times out of a hundred you can out race. He could end up with Alonso or someone else genuinely good.
losers title is the wrong word but the championship has been tainted by the way it was won.
Rosberg hasn't won anything yet but what if he does a Vettel and goes on to win the remaining races at a canter and ends up with a 100 point advantage over Hamilton? Would you still remember it as a tainted title for a few incidents mid season that ended up having no bearing on the title?losers title is the wrong word but the championship has been tainted by the way it was won.