*** Big Fat Weight Loss Thread ***

Syla5 said:
Is that 1500 cals target not factoring in exercise etc? Because 1500 cals is low especially for a chap your size (talking height not just weight) and for the amount of activity you do. Personally ive been cutting again on around the 2k cals mark. My target is set at 1500 with zero activity so i eat back a reasonable amount of what i burn during exercise and im down around 7kg in the last 8-9 weeks.

Also if your watch is a garmin, mine is as well, i take its performance measure with a pinch of salt. I went for a long time where every session was +1-6. Then i had a couple of quieter weeks on the bike and only a couple of sessions were negative on the performance measure. Now again every session for the last couple of weeks has been +1-6 or more even! I dont feel like im constantly improving thats for sure.
Click to expand...

Yeah, it's without exercise. I try and then eat whatever calories my watch says i've burnt. I know it's likely a high estimate, but given i use HR straps and power meters then i figure it should be fairly accurate and ~650kcal per hour seems around right for walking/cycling at the intensity i do.
I generally alternate between setting to 1500 and adding on calories burned and working out average calories over the week and then working out a revised daily amount from that. The latter probably makes more sense to ensure i'm adequately fueled for long rides etc, but i'm happy to take an overall average and look more at trending. If i "overeat" one day, then it doesn't affect me mentally as long as i know over the week i'm still in a defecit. I also purposely set to only 1500 because i'm not strict at tracking every little thing, so it gives me a buffer. If i have 2 coffess with ~50ml of milk, i know that those 100kcal or so of milk isn't going to affect me, whereas setting higher targets it becomes a bigger issue.

My general thinking is that if my BMR is ~2500kcal as per most calculators when selecting sedentary, then assuming i average 5000kcal a week in exercise at a minimum, and with maybe 5000steps per day on top of that. My daily calories burned should be around 3300 or so. As long as i'm recording 2000-2200/day in MFP, then i'm probably around 2500 with extra bits on top (milk, condiments etc) so i should still have a reasonable deficit on a weekly basis.

Yeah, the Garmin is weird. I sometimes turn it off. It's especially annoying when i used to run Ultras as they'd inevitably be a bit of a drive away with an early start, so occasionally i'd be waking up at 2-3am, then driving a couple hours ready to start around 6am. I'd be tired after poor sleep, and the mental impact of your watch saying you feel like crap 10 minutes into a 50 mile run isn't helpful :p
 
Last edited:
I give myself a -200-500 buffer with calories, so my target on MFP is -1.5lb per week, my activity level is set to the lowest, this gives me a 1500 target, i then do my exercise on top, and i try to end the day anywhere from 0 to 500 calories remaining, depending on how the weight on the scale is moving and how my energy levels during exercise have been. 9.5 weeks in an 15.5lbs down, im a little ahead of target so these last couple of days and maybe the next couple i will be eating to have 0 calories remaining in MFP or go over and end at -100-200 remaining (so 100-200 over target) just to help boost back up ATP stores.

A 2500 BMR for sedentary though is quite high.

Martynt74 said:
My general thinking is that if my BMR is ~2500kcal as per most calculators when selecting sedentary, then assuming i average 5000kcal a week in exercise at a minimum, and with maybe 5000steps per day on top of that. My daily calories burned should be around 3300 or so. As long as i'm recording 2000-2200/day in MFP, then i'm probably around 2500 with extra bits on top (milk, condiments etc) so i should still have a reasonable deficit on a weekly basis.
Click to expand...

Track everything!! it adds up a lot faster then you think when you dont...... you know this ;)
 
Last edited:
Haha i know. I'm just unsure if i'd stick with tracking if i put too much effort in, for example if i have Spaghetti for tea, i just search for a random entry for Bolognaise and stick around 700kcal in. I just need some rough ballpark figures, then my goal is to assess how things are going. Obviously it's easy with some things, like a meal replacement drink is easy to track (breakfast)

As mentioned the last week i should've in theory lost weight so obviously i'm undercounting as i didn't see the correlating movement, so my aim will be to up what i enter for various food items i eat. and eventually things should align!
 
Syla5 said:
A 2500 BMR for sedentary though is quite high.
Click to expand...

I thought that too. Maybe due to size/weight? This site has me even higher!

d2je2mW.png
 
Really need to be using a calculator that factors in BF% as well, 2.6k works at 20% BF but at 35% it drops to 2.2k for example. Also BMR base is 2.1k adding on 450 for sedentary is the equivalent of 5k steps per day still above doing nothing. That's not really sedentary so I'm not sure why the calculators seem to have taken a shift that sedentary actually isn't baseline when really it should be pretty much.
 
Martynt74 said:
Ah, that's decent to know, probably helps to understand why my deficit isn't quite as high as i would expect.
Click to expand...
A combination of not actually tracking everything consistently, average generic calculator, and variance in calories burned tracking.

As @Raymond Lin says be conservative.

If you under track calories by 10% (track only 2k instead of 2.2k), over estimate your baseline by 10%-15% (set at 2.2k instead of 1.9k) and over estimate calories burned by 10% (burn 500-1k instead of 450-900) that could be easily 500 calories over target every day for what you might not realise. All these small things add up and this is why its essential, at least initially to really establish your baselines with strict tracking of all intake.
 
Martynt74 said:
Can i not just set my goal to 1000 and then i'm onto a winner? :D
Click to expand...
Well you can now, if you have done a week at 1500 and not lost any weight then adjusting that down by 500 cals should see you at a -3500 deficit / -1lb per week. If you want to lose more then obviously you have to go harder then this.
 
I just do bodyweight in lbs x 10-12 (lower end if I hate myself) and write my macros down daily on scrap paper. Protein stays similar regardless of what I’m doing, fats go a bit lower and obviously carbs take a bit hit but are still around 200g a day currently Whatever you put down you will 100% underestimate what actually goes in your mouth so really most of it is just monitoring the scale + measurements and eating less if things haven’t moved for more than a couple of weeks.
 
I've been tracking for the last week as I got out of the habit a long time ago, basically just writing everything down on paper rather than an app. Just amazing how quickly calories add up.
 
Down around half a kg for this week, i'm alright with that if i can keep it up. More would be better but i'm working on making it sustainable and i like beer and bread! Interestingly i decided to run a graph from Garmin of calories consumed. Given it has all my metrics built in and 24/7 HR with all activities recorded through it, i figure it's probably reasonably accurate.

5mZvyXB.png


Seems to suggest average calories of 3200/day, although the last week has only averaged around 2700 as i've not been riding as much and just doing short walks/strength work.
 
Last edited:
Garmin doesnt track calories consumed, that will be any app you have linked to garmin and will only be what youve logged/input. What would be more useful would be to run a second data line for calories burned. 0.5kg in a week is quite low of a target even for sustained weight loss. 1-1.5% bw per week is a good goal, especially towards the start of the journey. You can do this.
 
No fancy graphs here, but after a hellish difficult 2023 with a massive work project, I'm down 11kg YTD. I was skirting with being overweight although I wore it well, but I didn't feel good. Now I'm feeling so much better with the weight gone. Another 5kgs to go and that's where I want to be, and where I was when I moved to NZ 10 years ago.

Only made some small changes to the diet, cut out junk food, smaller meal portions at night. Breakfast is a smoothy and lunch is a small meal. Snacks are nuts (which I had to limit as I started scoffing those by the bag) or fruit. Also started doing a lot of walking at moderate intensity with a lot of bodyweight exercises 3-4 nights a week.

A bit stuck at the moment as the lifestyle changes saw me lose 11kg without much difficulty, but the weight hasn't moved much the past 2 weeks. Started doing jogging, intertwined with intermittently sprinting. I'm expecting this will help going forward.

I'm finding the diet changes the easiest, the exercise, not so much these days ...
 
regulus said:
A bit stuck at the moment as the lifestyle changes saw me lose 11kg without much difficulty, but the weight hasn't moved much the past 2 weeks.
Click to expand...
I don't know if it's obvious or not, but I think some folk think if they eat X and exercise Y, then they will lose weight. In fact, you'll change your body to someone that does X and Y. (This also works if X is too high and Y is too low as we will surely have seen with a lot of Joe public) To move it again, lower X or increase Y. My X is quite high because I like eating too much I think. Thankfully, because I cycle my Y is really high too, so I'm reasonably okay.
 
AndyCr15 said:
I don't know if it's obvious or not, but I think some folk think if they eat X and exercise Y, then they will lose weight. In fact, you'll change your body to someone that does X and Y. (This also works if X is too high and Y is too low as we will surely have seen with a lot of Joe public) To move it again, lower X or increase Y. My X is quite high because I like eating too much I think. Thankfully, because I cycle my Y is really high too, so I'm reasonably okay.
Click to expand...
I personally break it down to: Eat less, move more. And if I stop losing, move even more.
 
Today showed that my brains perception of a portion of chorizo in my scrambled eggs varies wildly from MFP's perception!

What has improved recently is snacking. We've had crisps and those christmas style cracker/pretzel mix type things in since Friday along with 2 tubs of ice cream in the freezer and other than when my wife brings me a small bowl i've not devoured them like i usually would :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom