Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 30,982
Agreed, a lot of settings are just superfluous nonsense. Tweaking really helps to kick my XTX along at 4k when it's needed!
Last edited:
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Blackwell gpus
- Thread starter scubes
- Start date
Polar opposite for me. If I wanted to compromise I’d stick with my PS5, not spend a small fortune on a PC.
Much prefer putting the settings to max and just playing the game. However, that’s an expensive business @ 4K.
Why? It does the same job with one button. My time is more valuable than sitting there tweaking for an extra 1fps I don't need.
Anyway, doesn't matter for the 20 year old games I play. Making the most of my setup
Last edited:
Why? It does the same job with one button. My time is more valuable than sitting there tweaking for an extra 1fps I don't need.
Anyway, doesn't matter for the 20 year old games I play. Making the most of my setup
It gets it wrong a lot of the times that's why. At least on new games anyway. Plus manually tweaking is better and for me more fun
It gets it wrong a lot of the times that's why. At least on new games anyway. Plus manually tweaking is better and for me more fun
Does it? Genuinely not noticed, it generally puts the slider to quality and then sets most things right.
Only weird one is on Stellaris where it insists putting it on some potato res 1440p
I would start by assuming a 3090 will run Hogwarts at 60fps with everything on High and DLSS at every major resolution below 4k. That would be my starting point.
Thanks.
With ray tracing off, everything at ultra and ‘DLSS quality’, it tends to hover at +110 with occasional dips to 90ish, so have capped it to 100fps via nvidea control panel and have left it like that. Might cap it down to 90, save on those temps!
Ok then it runs great! What is the impact of RT on your frames?
It tanks it considerably. Maybe by 30% for low.
I did find this YouTube video really helpful in understanding the performance hits and the value.
The RT bit starts from 8:42.
The effect does make subtle ambient lighting took quite a bit better but it was also make surfaces a little mirrory and ‘hyper realistic’. It IS better but having it off is still good and tbh unless your A/Bing you’d never really know.
Seeking vids like this is really worth it
Edit: Oh just to add, I personally perceive the difference between 60fps to 90fps to be always be worth making sacrifices for.
Last edited:
Associate
no news on blackwell, its ruined my enthusiasm.. so whats the opinion on sept launch?
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 30,982
Non-existent
you mean over to AMD to balls up another launchbetter they don't release this year, it seems all big releases flop this year and over to you AMD. Intel are on fire
I don't think these are releasing in September, there would have been leaks.
I could still just about believe November for a 5080/5090 launch, but if we haven't had an announcement by mid-September, it'll likely be next year. The complete absence of "informal" news compared with the Ampere and Lovelace launches makes me suspect it's next year anyway.
Soldato
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop GPU confirmed to feature GDDR7 memory and 25W lower TGP than RTX 4060 - VideoCardz.com
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50 Laptop GPU aka GN22 now being actively discussed publicly by Chinese Hasee According to Wu Haijun, Chairman of Shenzhen Hasee Computer Co., a Chinese company that produces desktops, Mini-PCs, and laptops, the next-generation GeForce RTX 50 graphics cards in the popular X60...
videocardz.com
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 "Laptop" GPU To Consume Lower Power Than Ada, Features GDDR7 & RTX 4070-Level Performance
NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 5060 "Blackwell" laptop GPU could end up being a major upgrade over RTX 4060 according to Chinese manufacturer, Hasee.
wccftech.com
Associate
looks like amd (with their mediocre products) is going to beat nvidia to the market this generation
That would probably be to AMD's advantage. There will always be some people desperate enough for an upgrade that they'll jump at the first to come along, even if something better is just a few months behind it.
Without wanting to re-open debates on AMD's marketing... I think launching slightly later than Nvidia played out very badly for AMD in the last couple of generations. The performance levels of the Nvidia cards were already well-known by the time AMD hit the shelves and, at that point, "a bit cheaper, competitive in raster, much worse at raytracing and upscaling" isn't a compelling sales pitch, at least at the higher end of the market. Go first and they get, however briefly, to have the fastest card around for a while (assuming their top-end card can beat the 4090, at least in raster).