I actually find the Dakota leather in my g30 much softer than it was in the f22... And the Dakota leather in a friend's g01 felt different again (much smoother, less texture). All things considered my butt cares very little once I'm in them
Really? Do people expect a 5 1/2 year old car with 80,000+ miles on it to be in showroom condition?
I think people expect a 13 grand car to be in good condition rather than showroom condition so if it can be fixed cheaply then why not?
It was a trade value of about 13k so 12.5k seems very low to me.
It’s as simple as this, if I’m in the market for such a car at ballpark £13k and I’m looking at two similar examples one is yours with door damage and scuffed wheels the other is unmarked by comparison then which one would I buy?Really? Do people expect a 5 1/2 year old car with 80,000+ miles on it to be in showroom condition?
Perhaps more surprising is people will pay £14k for a 5year old diesel with 80k miles on
Perhaps more surprising is people will pay £14k for a 5year old diesel with 80k miles on
An e92 Coupe LCI 330D won't be a million miles away when new price wise from an e92 335D M sport, but the later will be worth twice as much on the market.
Maybe not exatly half, but the gap is actually ridiculous.Whilst I take your point (I mentioned list price as his post was written as if we were talking about a diesel Renault or something) an LCI 330d E92 is not worth half an E92 335d.
Agree, more like a 335D worth around 50% more.You can't use the bottom of the market outliers to make a point like that. Who knows why that cheap one is that cheap?
Let's do a fair and like for like comparison and take the glasses trade value for a 2010/60 example of both with say 100k on.
335d M Sport: £9044
330d M Sport: £7661
Nothing like twice the value.