Soldato
- Joined
- 9 Oct 2009
- Posts
- 9,258
- Location
- United Kingdom
Well, here is my new toy.
BMW e91 330d Touring M Sport, 44,000 on the clock, 1 owner, 2005.
That looks in superb nick given its age.
Well, here is my new toy.
BMW e91 330d Touring M Sport, 44,000 on the clock, 1 owner, 2005.
Unless it's bowed or otherwise damaged just leave the rad alone - replace it if/when it goes or if you've got other items to swap out meaning you'll be draining the coolant anyway
This seems pretty cheap for a proper job?Can anyone recommend a good rolling road garage to get my 330d remapped at? Max spend about £300.
Speak to Jason at http://www.bwchiptune.co.uk. He's considered to be one of the best.
That looks in superb nick given its age.
Seems to me that guy is a complete crook, stupid really as he shouldn't get any repeat business with practices like that. Tell your friend to look at the guidance online from trading standards regarding The Supply of Goods and Services Act, looks like this work would blatantly breach requirements for it to be "done with reasonable care and skill" and be "of satisfactory quality and fit for purpose".
will do thanks. i thought about small claims court but with the guy advertising the work with a months guarantee then i doubt there would be any point.
It also gives better economy, which for me doing many motorway miles will add up and pay for it's self in 12 months.
It will likely be around 270-280bhp from 230bhp (give or take due to age). Then from 500NM to around 600NM (give or take) of torque.
[TW]Fox;28364660 said:It doesn't - this is largely a hearsay snake oil effect. The benefit is increased performance and it really ends there.
It's up to you but I genuinely do not believe you can reliability get 280bhp and 600nm out of a 10+ year old M57 engine and I think you are asking for trouble having somebody who claims you can map it. Even with 10 subsequent years of progress BMW have not quite managed to reach that with the x30d and that's despite an all-new engine not an engine that first appeared in 1998 - it's already at it's safe design limits in 231bhp form (it originally appeared with just 184bhp as it's maximum power output).
Why would they have gone to the trouble of developing the 335d in order to obtain 280bhp if it was so easy and consequence free to get it from the 330d?
Gearbox will probably be ok though as I believe it's a ZF6HP26 which is rated at 600nm (Though at 10 years old you'll probably accelerate the need for a rebuild).
You've not even got the car yet, personally I'd just enjoy it as it is, at least for now. You've managed to find an exceptionally rare decent condition low mileage example, don't be in such a rush to tune it to the max, fit Ebay lights, etc etc.
It okay, whack those injectors up to 11, they'll last, no problem.
I really see no downside to a remap, seriously.
Rebuild the gearbox? I really don't think it's going to be the case any time soon.
But the truth is, 3 days of the week, it's motorway running, the other 2, sat at home on the drive whilst I'm in London.
A friend of mine at work said mapping his 320d was probably one of the best things he's done to his car. Simply as it 'runs, pulls and drives better' (his words, not mine).
Do what you like with the car but it's already got a nice engine with a good balance of power and nice box to go with it. I wouldn't personally waste the money on it. I'd remove the swirl flaps as planned though and keep your remap money to go towards a turbo or the likes should it need it during your ownership
It's also more difficult to sell this sort of car with any sort of modification
[TW]Fox;28364912 said:It just sounds like a box ticking exercise. He's not taken delivery of it yet, he's barely driven it aside from a short test drive but internet says 'yea its totally free power with zero downsides!111' so it's on the mod shopping list before he even knows if he's got an issue with the standard power offered by the car.
Slow down, get the car, enjoy it for a bit.
[TW]Fox;28364993 said:The response you posted about 25 seconds before I hit submit? Do you not think that perhaps I was already typing my reply as you posted it?
[TW]Fox;28364999 said:You don't need a crystal ball to work out somebody who posted a reply at 18:05 was probably typing it before you hit submit at 18:04