No doubt. There's no way you get to an investigation based on one "slip of the tongue".There's definitely more at play than the article suggests. He clearly has strong beliefs which may be at odds with school obligations or policy but he has an agenda and a point he wants to be public.
No doubt. There's no way you get to an investigation based on one "slip of the tongue".
Most shocking thing on that article is that kids as young as 3 years old are having gender identity treatment. What the **** is that about.
Calm down, this isn't an opportunity to damn faith based state schools. Firstly, it's an academy, not a state school. Secondly, it's not a faith school, academy or otherwise. Thirdly, even if it were a faith based state school, it's the school itself conducting the investigation into the teacher, so you still couldn't really condemn the school.Indeed. Not the place of the church to force their values upon children, frankly embarrassing when you look into what the state schooling system allows faith schools to get away with.
Imagine he was a muslim.Calm down, this isn't an opportunity to damn faith based state schools. Firstly, it's an academy, not a state school. Secondly, it's not a faith school, academy or otherwise. Thirdly, even if it were a faith based state school, it's the school itself conducting the investigation into the teacher, so you still couldn't really condemn the school.
At risk of being overly judgmental of one of my Christian brothers, it's also telling that he's a pastor at a small church with a name that marks it out as being a bit fringe, and is seemingly so independent it's not even part of the FIEC. He's also being represented by the Christian legal centre, who are the go to crowd for this sort of silliness.
Imagine he was a muslim.
Would you still be attempting to discredit him on the basis of the mosque he attends?
Just sayin'
The BBC article says next to nothing. Nor do any other of the websites reporting this. That's not at all surprising given this is under active investigation. The investigation will have been started for whatever reasons, and he'll have gone crying to the CLC, who will have then fired up the publicity machine with the likes of the Mail on Sunday knowing they can get some nutters on side.FoxEye said:The BBC article doesn't imply there was any other wrong-doing, and you're reading between the lines based largely on the church he attends.
Exactly.Good to see people standing up against this gender fashion BS
Most shocking thing on that article is that kids as young as 3 years old are having gender identity treatment. What the **** is that about.
And when the heck did that become a censored word?
I'm going to stick to the facts here: You don't know what you're talking about.Exactly.
I think its pathetic all this non gender crap. If you are born with meat and 2 veg you are a man if a kebab you are a woman. The only one to add is born with both then hermaphrodite end of
Go on, explain why that would be hypocrisy...Teacher should wait until said student refers to him as Sir.... Then lets see the hypocrisy of the school.
I'm going to stick to the facts here: You don't know what you're talking about.