Britain's Defences

The good news from all this it looks like we are going back to CATOBAR and so they should be we are the only nation in the world that could build a super carrier and still use STOVL on them.
 
if this is all true i would think it very unlikely that either carrier will ever put to sea equipped with a British only contingent, the lack of planes until 2020 and the reversion to CATOBAR sounds very much like we plan to share these with other nations, I'm guessing the French will be heavily involved.

It seems a shame but if the government think we can live without a carier threat for many years why do we need one at all?
 
It seems a shame but if the government think we can live without a carier threat for many years why do we need one at all?

It is a shame, but at the same time we can't afford anything else right now thanks to Labour & MOD wasting money
 
Catapult Assisted Take Off But Arrested Recovery

Short Take Off and Vertical Landing.

STOVL does seem archaic, when compared with the runway/landing system on somthing like a Nimitz class supercarrier.

If they were small carriers i would see the point in us going STOVL, but like i said these are super carriers lets get the CATOBAR back, then we can buy in radar aircraft and maybe even some electronic warfare aircraft, hell get some refuelling ones as well.



It seems a shame but if the government think we can live without a carier threat for many years why do we need one at all?

Aircraft carriers are like hospitals, you don't need one every day but they are a life saver when you do need them.
 
If they were small carriers i would see the point in us going STOVL, but like i said these are super carriers lets get the CATOBAR back, then we can buy in radar aircraft and maybe even some electronic warfare aircraft, hell get some refuelling ones as well.





Aircraft carriers are like hospitals, you don't need one every day but they are a life saver when you do need them.

yeah imagine we had another falklands on our hands? , did it not slightly kick off recently over oil?
 
I can see us having at the very least a 2:1 kill ratio over them in the event of an attempted invasion.

This thread is obviousy silly, but this is such a silly statement in nature that I couldn't help but be very amused :p

Personally I think if you factor in our knowledge of taking the Birmingham Toll road, it will most likely be 3:7.
 
Aircraft carriers are like hospitals, you don't need one every day but they are a life saver when you do need them.

I think you misunderstand me, I am a huge advocate of us maintaining our carriers. What I'm saying is the government think that we can have a 5+ year gap now with no operational jets at sea without significant risk to our country, dependencies or role in world politics then why do we suddenly need them in 2020? It seems like a half baked decision to me.
 
Odd that the BBC imply that making a carrier non STOVL will save money as if it's cheaper to build in the catapult and arrestor. Navy should now scrap the vertical version of the F-35 and build both carriers with catapult.
 
I think you misunderstand me, I am a huge advocate of us maintaining our carriers. What I'm saying is the government think that we can have a 5+ year gap now with no operational jets at sea without significant risk to our country, dependencies or role in world politics then why do we suddenly need them in 2020? It seems like a half baked decision to me.

Looks to be more like almost 10 years without a 'working' carrier, unless we borrow some French jets. And pilots to fly them.

Ark Royal scrapped almost now. If we're lucky, JSF will be operational by 2010, if it overruns even 20% of what the Eurofighter (2000) overran, we'll be looking at 2025-30 by the time we have jets on the new carriers.

Right now our Anti-Air destroyers are virtually weaponless as the PAAMS hasnt been made operational, and with no carriers for the next 15 years, just what *CAN* the Royal Navy actually do?
 
Odd that the BBC imply that making a carrier non STOVL will save money as if it's cheaper to build in the catapult and arrestor. Navy should now scrap the vertical version of the F-35 and build both carriers with catapult.

I think thats what they will do, i think the bbc got their facts wrong, I think they will be halo carriers until the F-35C is ready.
 
It's funny that just now some Tornado F3s have just headed backed into Leuchars after being scrambled to go and escort some Russian Bears out of the UK airspace. Two days in a row now that the Russians are coming for a look.

Brilliant timing isn't it.
 
Back
Top Bottom