Soldato
That job's done IMO, even if they keep you on. Plenty of work in that sector so move on, and keep things super proffessional at the next place, now you've seen what can happen when nasty people are involved.
like one of our service-users wanting me to assist him in looking through escort services in the local area. I thought it was okay since technically it is the guy's own house.
That job's done IMO, even if they keep you on. Plenty of work in that sector so move on, and keep things super proffessional at the next place, now you've seen what can happen when nasty people are involved.
So it went okay but doesn't look great.
Yeah, that might be worth a bash.Potentially write them to the tone of how you have above? You seem to be well written and it might be a good way of getting your side of it over to them to counter her little box of evidence?
I think you're right. The mistake I made was not going to the deputy manager to ask if this is appropriate. Instead I mentioned in to a couple of people in the staff room. They said that the guy in question used to have escorts visit him in his house on site and that staff would sometimes have to clean up after them the next morning when the day-shiift came in. This coming from, shock-horror: the woman who has done all the complaining.Frankly sounds like you have a significant lack of judgement and self-awareness in an industry where it is relatively important to the role and you've an uphill battle ahead of you even if no malice was meant on your part. You'll also need to stick to your guns as to there being no intention of malice on your part, even if it means being somewhat confrontational (because being timid in that respect will be seen as accepting guilt on your part).
But from their point of view, a complaint has been made - so they have to make an awkward decision of upholding it, or not.
This is probably what counts against our OP the most; all management know is that a new employee has had a multi-part complaint made against them.
This is probably what counts against our OP the most; all management know is that a new employee has had a multi-part complaint made against them. Difficult, from their point of view, to argue that it's worth the risk of finding out whether or not the new hire is actually going to be worth it or is just going to be an on-going problem that should be nipped in the bud.
B..b..b...b...but, my workplace says they want everyone to be themselves, bring their "whole" selves to work, etc. (as long as those views perfectly accord with those of the workplace).
How would that warning hold up legally? Hamas are recognised as a terrorist organisation by the UK, so I’d imagine criticising them is pretty much legally fine. I’d politely suggest your friend is telling porkies about their warning or perhaps were more than just ‘criticising’ Hamas.
Turns out that suddenly doesn't apply once they realise that the real you is a foul mouthed racist...
You’re implying I’m a foul mouthed racist?
and your reply should have been 'it was her words and her offer - if she didn't want to feel uncomfortable then maybe she shouldn't have made an offer that could have been misconstrued as offering sexual favours for the lift home. she should count herself lucky i jumped in to offer in order to save her further embarrasement or awkwardness'I'm asked if I could see how this might have been uncomfortable for her as it contained sexual connotations.
and your reply should have been 'it was her words and her offer - if she didn't want to feel uncomfortable then maybe she shouldn't have made an offer that could have been misconstrued as offering sexual favours for the lift home. she should count herself lucky i jumped in to offer in order to save her further embarrasement or awkwardness'