-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Catalyst 7.8 beta
- Thread starter Mekrel
- Start date
Yeah its hard to believe, ain't it. Why don't you X2900XT owners check it first, before judging so called unfounded statements.
It looks like ingame AF don't filter all the texturestages, it defenitly isn't 16xAF.
Just to be clear, I'm only talking about ingame AF in this part. game.
It looks like ingame AF don't filter all the texturestages, it defenitly isn't 16xAF.
Just to be clear, I'm only talking about ingame AF in this part. game.
Last edited:
gareth170 said:
Actually the difference is pretty minimal... maybe a couple fps max in the lower resolutions: http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/lost_planet_demo_directx_10_performance/page3.asp
Tom|Nbk said:
Well, it's not my problem when people are "fooled" by not getting full (16x)AF with ingame AF in this game, but I'll finish what I started:
Beware for popups
Ingame max AF:
http://www.megaupload.com/nl/?d=YATFLVRC
CCC 16AF:
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=AP79LQG9
Note, this is what I get with Vista64, maybe something is messed up in Vista64, I don't know, I've seen stranger things in this OS.
Quite a difference don't you think?
Last edited:
Skinner said:
I'll check the links out later it may be just that game specifically has some problems enabling AF that's all. I know for a fact i've heard nothing like this so far and I think if it was a widespread issue the whole internet would know about it.
ok guys i no this is the thread for cat 7.8 beta but i finally got round to doing the time demo in stalker using cat 7.7 using 2 1 gig ati hd 2009xt in crossfire... time _play short_timedemo............ total key frames 66 memory usage 240958k..... [demo] fps: min [4.175804] av [186.212967] middle [235.897980 max [830.204468]...... next .....demo_play buildings_timedemo total keys frames 65... memory usag 242837k...[ demo] fps:min [9.739083] average[194.666718] middle [237.625519] max[973.537354]..... thats a res 1280x1024
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 16 Aug 2004
- Posts
- 732
- Location
- Bury
Something seems to be going in the right direction.
didnt used to get anywhere near that at those settings
was done in vista 64
didnt used to get anywhere near that at those settings
was done in vista 64
Skinner said:
First of all.
Thanks for wasting 10mb of my bandwidth (Yes I do want that 10mb back
)There is no difference as far as I can see maybe your eyes are better than mine but I think your seeing things (or not).
Thanks for wasting my time
That is S.T.A.L.K.E.R one of the most unpredictable games performance/graphics wise In a while it wouldnt suprise me if the in game AF isn't applied properly, half the time the in built AA/Edge Smoothing dosn't activate properly.
willhub said:Well I think at 1600x1200 there is an advantage, you dont need as much AA, which means better performance, as at my res I need 8xAA - 16xAA, and you know what needing no AA means at higher res on a HD2900XT
Ahem ... yes you do, if you have a decent monitor, you can still see jaggies at 1920x1200 trust me
Vogon said:Ahem ... yes you do, if you have a decent monitor, you can still see jaggies at 1920x1200 trust me
Not as much AA is needed as at 1440x900.............................
Skinner said:
should have gone to specsavers tbh.
Last edited:
Another new review.
http://techreport.com/reviews/2007q3/radeon-hd-2900xt-1gb/index.x?pg=1
And just for Will....
http://techreport.com/reviews/2007q3/radeon-hd-2900xt-1gb/index.x?pg=1
And just for Will....
