Chemical attack in London...

As soon as someone who claims asylum here is convicted of a serious enough crime to merit time in prison they should be shipped back to wherever they came from. I don't give a single **** if you have a family here. I care even less if your life will be in danger if you are sent home. The contract is that you abide by our laws and rules and we take you in. You break that contract and back you go. Your choice to commit the crime. Suffer the consequences. I don't care about the reasons. Its a privilege to be granted asylum.
 
Hades said:
"We have to do better with education. We have to support them (boys) to have better attitudes to women."
Click to expand...

When the current "education" to young boys is to continually punch down on them that they are toxic, misogynistic, sexual deviants in waiting; and the only "counter" to this argument are from people like Andrew Tate and Justin Waller, its not surprising there is an issue... You have polar opposite arguments/opinions and no middle ground to work from.
 
Last edited:
Nutty667 said:
Christ on a bike!
The Tory party may be stuffed with incompetent, lying, thieving self-serving ****s, but when the alternative is a Labour party filled with people of similar mindset.
God help us.
Click to expand...

And the silly thing is the presenter on the BBC's flagship news program doesn't do her job and challenge any of it but just nods along like an idiot and throws in extra suggestions herself.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Richie said:
When the current "education" to young boys is to continually punch down on them that they are toxic, misogynistic, sexual deviants in waiting; and the only "counter" to this argument are from people like Andrew Tate and Justin Waller, its not surprising there is an issue... You have polar opposite arguments/opinions and no middle ground to work from.
Click to expand...
Agree 100% but I don't think it's relevant in the case of Alkali Abdul.
 
fez said:
As soon as someone who claims asylum here is convicted of a serious enough crime to merit time in prison they should be shipped back to wherever they came from. I don't give a single **** if you have a family here. I care even less if your life will be in danger if you are sent home. The contract is that you abide by our laws and rules and we take you in. You break that contract and back you go. Your choice to commit the crime. Suffer the consequences. I don't care about the reasons. Its a privilege to be granted asylum.
Click to expand...

You can’t do that though it will upset a lot of the soft touch/human rights people, and the lawyers won’t get their pay packets protecting these pieces of ****.
 
Last edited:
Nasher said:
You can "become Christian" to get citizenship? What is this, the Viking age?
Click to expand...
If you come from an extreme Islamic country such as Afghanistan then being Christian lends you persecution. By converting to Christianity here he was able to argue that he would be persecuted if we deported him.
 
Hades said:
If you come from an extreme Islamic country such as Afghanistan then being Christian lends you persecution. By converting to Christianity here he was able to argue that he would be persecuted if we deported him.
Click to expand...

But OFC, they don't actually start following Christianity. Converting back the second they walk out.
 
Last edited:
Hades said:
"His asylum status is not the issue"

"We see ever increasing incel culture"

"Microaggressions"

"We have to do better with education. We have to support them (boys) to have better attitudes to women."

"Cuts to women's services"


Jesus!
Click to expand...
Obviously he was a fine morally upstanding gentleman until he came to the UK and was radicalised by British incel culture!

Standard BBC unfortunately. They’re not willing to discuss issues. They’re only interested in somehow reframing the debate to point the blame at “toxic masculinity “ and working class British men.

Even when immigration and a lack of effective border controls are very obviously the problem here.

Despite this the BBC are only interested in using it as a means of pushing their chosen narrative of it being the fault of “all men” in general!

They’re as bad as the police with the initial description of the attacker as “a man” from Newcastle!

STOP PAYING THE LICENSE FEE or you’re funding and enabling this propaganda!
 
Last edited:
potatolord said:
Someone in the Home Office will be having a bad day.

www.bbc.co.uk

Alkali attack suspect Abdul-Shokoor Ezedi was not eligible for asylum

Home Office rules suggest Abdul-Shokoor Ezedi's criminal record should have stopped him being granted asylum.
www.bbc.co.uk
Click to expand...

He shouldn't have even been here in 2018 to carry out the sexual assault. He arrived illegally in a lorry in 2016 form Afghanistan, that's when the Taliban hadn't taken over, he should have been sent back in 2016... if he had then both the sexual assault in 2018 and this chemical attack this year could have been avoided. In addition to however much we've had to pay to accommodate him and fund his life in the UK for the past 8 years.
 
dowie said:
LOL apparently it's "incel culture" in this country, nothing wrong re: the asylum system being broken.

Don't look at Sweden and the big spike in rapes there either, it must be microaggressions and the culture/issues with men in general in the country the asylum seekers are arriving in... we must do better in schools????
Click to expand...

I’m truly flabbergasted at this. Astounded. How was this aired and not even challenged?
 
It is not toxic masculinity it is toxic religious teaching and belief. This guy was never a Christian and would rapidly change belief again if deported. However he will go to prison for many years and hopefully be marked as a child abuser whilst doing his time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom