'Contact lost' with Malaysia Airlines plane

Not thinking about the black box recording as much as the beacon. Unless it completely disintegrated I'm struggling to understand why they haven't been able to locate, if not recover, it.
 
This missing flight is intriguing.

Reminds me of Lost (TV show) and Langoliers.

Joking aside, I'm sure once they find some element of the plane of find the Mr Ali who bought those tickets, it may provide some answers.
 
Really?
Both of them?
Why on earth would this be a feature?

Cockpit reset under fault conditions.

If you've ever watched Aircraft Investigation, as I have, there's an episode covering this. The pilot was suicidal and before nose diving the plane into a river killing everyone on board, he sent the co-pilot out of the cabin, pulled various fuses, including the FDR, and then crashed the plane.

I also spent many years working on Tornado's in the R.A.F., so I'm familiar with , in a broad sense, how aircraft systems work.
 
Not thinking about the black box recording as much as the beacon. Unless it completely disintegrated I'm struggling to understand why they haven't been able to locate, if not recover, it.

As the BBC news says.

As well as possible sightings of wreckage, the search teams will be trying to find the aircraft's emergency locator transmitter (ELT) which is a location beacon.

However aviation experts say ELTs do not always work in the event of a major crash into water.

The plane also has a "black box" consisting of the cockpit voice recorder and the flight data recorder.

If immersed in water it should activate a "pinger" that can draw investigators to the location, although the signal cannot be detected over long distances.

Its also not rare, took 9 days to find the wreckage of Adam Air flight 574.
 
Last edited:
As the BBC news says.



Its also not rear, took 9 days to find the wreckage of Adam Air flight 574
Cheers. Was the pinger I was thinking of rather than the ELT. Makes sense if they have to be relatively close to receive a signal :)

Edit: 30 day battery life, that's not good.
 
Last edited:
Very surprised they only have a 30 day battery life as well. Does anyone know why? Given the overall impact of having even two batteries must be minimal in a machine that size?

You'd have though they'd have improved that after the Air France 447 crash. Granted you couldn't stretch to 2 years but you must be able to get 6 months in a still-feasible size.
 
They are usually just two D batteries in my experience. recording all that they do for a month isnt too bad.

The big 40kg main aircraft batteries dont last long either.

I think its more like, how have you not found the plane in 30 days? if the battery life becomes an issue (and I dont think it regularly is). The french flight took a week and that was in the middle of the atlantic.
 
Nope I misread, it was a week till they found the aircraft not the boxes :)

That would also suggest the ELT and sonar pingers have a longer life than 30 days....
 
Cockpit reset under fault conditions.

If you've ever watched Aircraft Investigation, as I have, there's an episode covering this. The pilot was suicidal and before nose diving the plane into a river killing everyone on board, he sent the co-pilot out of the cabin, pulled various fuses, including the FDR, and then crashed the plane.

Well that's highly questionable, he was rich with the amount of money he had remaining and there had been previous reports of black boxes switching off by themselves.

They are usually just two D batteries in my experience. recording all that they do for a month isnt too bad.

That's pretty poor indeed. A single lithium battery would last for over a year in comparison.

Aircraft should have a completely independent transponder in a black box like format, self powered, this way they wouldn't simply vanish from atc.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom