• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Core 9000 series

Anyone got any opinion or done any research on the best mATX or ITX boards to pair with a 9900k? Would an ITX board do it justice, or would mATX offer better options for power delivery etc..?
The Asus Gene looks impressive for power delivery and is the only mATX to sport 8+8 pins for the CPU. It is more like an oversized Mini ITX though than a true mATX.
 
Here's a handy list of current Z390 motherboards available at launch for those that aren't focused on moaning about a price we've all been aware of for ages.

Time to grab a coffee and suss out the options. :)

Zi0yp29.jpg
 
Last edited:
You have a point that it is nonsense but I have an explanation for it.
Pure greed. Christianity teaches us that greed is a sin but most (if not all) owners of Intel and nVidia are masons who believe in deism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_deadly_sins
Greed (Latin, avaritia), also known as avarice, cupidity, or covetousness, is, like lust and gluttony, a sin of desire. ... As defined outside Christian writings, greed is an inordinate desire to acquire or possess more than one needs, especially with respect to material wealth. https://www.google.de/search?q=chri...rome..69i57.5010j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

WTF are you talking about?
 
Retailers are just outright being greedy and trying to make as much profit as possible , its total BS when a retailer says they are hardly making anything on a newly released product that is in short supply , but high demand , one such example i read here in this thread earlier when someone said that O/C had the 9900k @ £600 but another retailer had it for £550 , but yip you guessed it that never lasted any length of time until that same retailer had raised their price to £600 as well , thus making an EXTRA £50 profit straight away.
The death of PC gaming will be down to these extorinate prices that seem to be effecting the major items in a PC , CPU,RAM, GPU.
 
Yup, Me as well. With pc components selling at super rich prices. You can bet pc gaming will be dead in the next few years if this continues.

I'm not convinced; PC gaming gives you the option of better performance/visuals than consoles if you are prepared to pay, or alternatively you can target lower end of the spectrum / older gear to save money and get parity with consoles. You really don't need these high end cpus for gaming, nice to have for sure, but plenty of adequate cheaper ones around. In recent years we've seen a drive for higher resolutions and refresh rates due to monitor tech improving, but really if you said ok I want to play 1080p @ 60hz how much power would you need from a PC to get something looking as good as consoles, not all that much really. Part of the attraction of PC gaming is you can totally customise your hardware setup, so unlike consoles you can set the ceiling on your spend as high or low as you like. A 16 thread intel chip at 5ghz is massive overkill for gaming, any game that really takes advantage of that is going to suck on a console anyway in relative terms, so the choice isn't "console of 9900k", it is "console or 9900k or something cheaper that performs as well or better than a console at something more akin to the pricing that PC gaming has sustained for years".
PC gaming has always cost more than consoles, and who knows what the next generation of consoles will cost, maybe they will be hit by rising hardware costs too.
Back in the day (from original playstation through to the Wii), games consoles cost around $199-299 typically (more favourable exchange rate then too), and a gaming PC was way more than that, and the death knell was called for PC gaming more than once, but still it survived.
 
On the other hand, the i7-9800X looks like it might be a bit of a dark horse. Assuming that hits at RRP, which is pretty unlikely, the premium for AVX512 and more PCI lanes has dropped significantly this gen.

Well OCUK has the 9700 for £500 and the 9900 for £600...
 
You have a point that it is nonsense but I have an explanation for it.
Pure greed. Christianity teaches us that greed is a sin but most (if not all) owners of Intel and nVidia are masons who believe in deism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_deadly_sins
Greed (Latin, avaritia), also known as avarice, cupidity, or covetousness, is, like lust and gluttony, a sin of desire. ... As defined outside Christian writings, greed is an inordinate desire to acquire or possess more than one needs, especially with respect to material wealth. https://www.google.de/search?q=chri...rome..69i57.5010j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
 
Interesting snippet from Tom’s preview testing of some Z390 boards.

“The best reason to pick one of the new Z390 boards over its predecessors might be that the voltage regulator cooling is designed for eight-core processors, at least at stock speeds. We found that every board needed direct fan cooling at the voltage regulator to overclock, but also found that every Z370 board needed direct fan cooling simply to run our eight-core processor at stock speed.”
 
Well the 9900K can be pre ordered for Total cost of £501.78 which includes Import fees deposit. However it is 2-4 days delivery. Without import fees the cost is £404.69.

There is no need to buy from a UK retailer who presences is just the UK market.... Only a fool would overpay £100. 2-4 day wait is worth the saving...
 
Last edited:
Well the 9900K can be pre ordered for Total cost of £501.78 which includes Import fees deposit. However it is 2-4 days delivery. Without import fees the cost is £404.69.

There is no need to buy from a UK retailer who presences is just the UK market.... Only a fool would overpay £100. 2-4 day wait is worth the saving...

What is warranty like?

In the UK I see it on a site with roughly the same name as me for £535
 
Interesting snippet from Tom’s preview testing of some Z390 boards.

“The best reason to pick one of the new Z390 boards over its predecessors might be that the voltage regulator cooling is designed for eight-core processors, at least at stock speeds. We found that every board needed direct fan cooling at the voltage regulator to overclock, but also found that every Z370 board needed direct fan cooling simply to run our eight-core processor at stock speed.”

I got shot down for suggesting you would need the 390 series boards to run the 9900k and OC it lol..

This whole release has been an absolute joke
 
I thought the i7 differentiated itself in the Intel line-up by having hyperthreading. Seems Intel are 'pulling an Nvidia', as the genuine successor to the 8700k is the i9 9900k, roll on AMD for my next upgrade.
 
Been saying this, all those people dreaming of a straight drop in 9900k to a Z370 mobo and expecting 5ghz+ all cores may have a rude awakening...
No way would I run the 9900k on anything other than a very good X390 mobo with the absolute best vrms and power delivery.

Owning an AMD 8/16 chip I know first hand you need decent VRMs hence I went for the CH6, and afaik the 1700 is lower TDP than the 9900k?

So while it's technically possible to drop the 9900k into the z370 boards, I certainly wouldn't if I want to run it above stock.

Will be interesting to see how much performance is left untapped in the 9900k though with a decent AIO or Water loop.

At least these won't need delidding, but I still expect binning on these and huge markups, could potentially see a £1000 5.4ghz or so binned chip.

Some z370 boards like the top 3 asrock boards have very good VRMs, which were considered overkill for the 8xxx chips.

Gigabyte improved a lot but thats because their z370 boards were a poor baseline.
 
So this chip is 480 in the US but 600 over here. Last time I checked the dollar was worth less than the pound.... Am I missing something here!? I am genuinely confused by this
 
Back
Top Bottom