What are the drawbacks of asking someone in the US to buy it for you and then ship it over as a present?
That it’s not customs first day at work and likely you will pay some import duty anyway.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
What are the drawbacks of asking someone in the US to buy it for you and then ship it over as a present?
What are the drawbacks of asking someone in the US to buy it for you and then ship it over as a present?
As a "gift" it's only liable for NOT paying import taxes on it if it's under 36 dollars.
Hmmmm delidded binned 8700k @ 5.1g for a 9900k? Shall I....
Are you saying it's not going to be generally faster? Just based off of the 8700k it is going to be and it seems as though it could clock higher more reliably.
Ok for anyone who is interested - obviously I have no clue what the retailers actually buy for - but through my work contacts and suppliers of retailers I have access to, they said they would sell it to a retailer for £441 ex. So that's still higher than the US cost once you add VAT - I've also been told that the 600 pre-order price in most cases is a best guess for them not to lose any money on the pre-order due to intel having production issues which they are just throwing money at to try and solve.
Edit: this is for i9 9900k pricing.
More fuel for the fire I guess ...
Intel's New Low: Commissioning Misleading Core i9-9900K Benchmarks
Also import taxes is not guaranteed.
Oh its going to be faster, but not the 30-50% that Intel would have you believe, watch that Hardware Unboxed video, explains it all perfectly. On average the 8700K is 9% faster than a 2700X @ 1080p with a 1080ti on Ultra settings, that fps lead diminishes as you go up resolutions...
So your telling me suddenly intel pulled another 20-40% performance out of the bag with just 2 more cores and HT? lolz...
The whole testing was extremely biased and flawed, that video is so damning, i now expect the 9900k to be no more than 10-12% faster than a 2700X with a 1080ti @ 1080p Ultra settings, yes still faster, but only marginally faster than an existing 8700k. But you get to pay a ridiculous price for that 12% perf, double if buying in the UK against a 2700X lol.
These are great times to be alive folks! £600 CPU's offering 2-4% performance uplift over previous gen, £1300 GPU's etc... and people wonder why consoles are getting so many new buyers.
Do these cpu's even have any hardware vulnerability fixes? Some sites say they do and others say they don't.
That simply isn't true though. The difference between 2933MHz with default timings versus 3200MHz with tightened timings can be gigantic in some cases. Hell, the difference between two 3200MHz kits can be significant.
https://www.gamersnexus.net/news-pc/3283-ryzen-2-pre-test-x470-vs-x370-scaling-memory-r7-2700x
Both of those are 3200MHz kits (the Geil being CL16 versus a CL14 Corsair). Even discounting the 20% gap in Ashes of the Benchmark, you're still seeing 5-10% in real games. Just from a few tweaked timings, let alone touching clock speed or properly tweaking timings manually.
Do these cpu's even have any hardware vulnerability fixes? Some sites say they do and others say they don't.
ASUS tech guy needs to do some homework.There was an ASUS tech guy on a stream yesterday, from what he said no unless you count no hyperthreading for 9700k being a fix. He said basically they have the same security fixes as the current gen built in, so nothing hardware but software/microcode.
That’s what I understood anyway!
I don't understand why anyone would buy these at that prices.