Associate
This might be worth a look for those not sure about the H50..
http://www.vortez.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=193
http://www.vortez.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=193
Worked on mine. Just another thread the same as this one.
Rab (Scotland) said:Q9550 @ 3.8
Had 1 of these over a month now, temps where 80c+ when running intelburst test. with my old scythe cooler, running same test, never went over 60c. Ran prime95 8 hrs, max any core hit was 56c.
also lets you use other ram slots which some coolers can block, great product.
Gaidin (Salisbury) said:Massive reduction in temps running a 4Ghz I7 920OC.
Easy to fit and no maintenance. I replaced my Fenrir and got a 12c drop in load temps. An excellent cooler for the price. Highly recommended.
I would be Gaidin. And those are the results I had. I have found that under the conditions I tested the H50 was at least 12c better than the Fenrir, and was comparable to the megahalems. Results and screenies can be seen earlier in this thread and other like it.
Originally Posted by Rab (Scotland)
Q9550 @ 3.8
Had 1 of these over a month now, temps where 80c+ when running intelburst test. with my old scythe cooler, running same test, never went over 60c. Ran prime95 8 hrs, max any core hit was 56c.
also lets you use other ram slots which some coolers can block, great product.
I think the thing is that in most comparisons TRUE, Fenrir and Megahalems are very close indeed.
There is no way that a properly fitted Fenrir is 12-20C worse than a TRUE or Megahalems, yet, there it is on the OcUK website.
Sorry, but these aren't as good as people are saying. It cost me £60 to find out, but they're NOT 12-20C better than a good air cooler.
I'm pretty sure you rowed back from all those claims and settled on something like 4C difference, no?