Crysis 1.1 is here

Samione · 8 Jan 2008 at 16:42

They should've addressed the cheating in MP before they released this patch.

LoadsaMoney · 8 Jan 2008 at 16:43

Re. Crysis 1.1 is here

... and does naff all, can i get an owned.

ergonomics · 8 Jan 2008 at 16:44

PinkFloyd said:
The game isn't coded poorly. Some people don't have the hardware to run the game. Runs flawlessly on high settings in 1920x1200 here.
.

lol

PinkFloyd · 8 Jan 2008 at 16:45

ergonomics said:
lol

Would you prefer companys not to bother pushing the boundaries?

Gerard · 8 Jan 2008 at 16:45

So a long wait for a patch that delivered naff all really.

Can't half tell ea have their finger stuck in the crytek pie can ya.

Wonder if Cervat is gonna promise another patch and tell us it'll be out in 7 days..months later.

Tom|Nbk · 8 Jan 2008 at 16:46

LoadsaMoney said:
... and does naff all, can i get an owned.

Oh go on then...

Gerard · 8 Jan 2008 at 16:46

Samione said:
They should've addressed the cheating in MP before they released this patch.

People actually play that multiplayer? :eek:

Probably the crytek devs response when they get interviewed about the patch ^^

ergonomics · 8 Jan 2008 at 16:47

PinkFloyd said:
Would you prefer companys not to bother pushing the boundaries?

no, i just dont believe that the game is running flawlessly throughout on high settings at that res. not saying you're lying.

Gerard · 8 Jan 2008 at 16:49

Does it run flawlessly at that res on levels like the aircraft carrier or the ice levels? For me those levels normaly tank the performance, fine and well to claim the earlier levels run well but those later levels cause a hit for everyone.

Greenboi · 8 Jan 2008 at 16:52

Pre-Patch:

08/01/2008 16:28:08 - Vista

Run #1- DX9 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 27.465
NEXT BENCH RUN- 08/01/2008 16:34:58 - Vista

Post-Patch:

08/01/2008 16:46:57 - Vista

Run #1- DX9 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 28.175

Biohazard · 8 Jan 2008 at 16:54

Which benchmark was that?

Robert · 8 Jan 2008 at 16:59

There's a new CPU test in there as well.

Tom|Nbk · 8 Jan 2008 at 17:00

No/Marginal performance improvements

Some people facing CD errors

Some people on Vista can't even install

Did Stevie Wonder validate this patch at QA?

perox · 8 Jan 2008 at 17:11

I wasn't expecting any performance improvements, the engine is just too demanding for our hardware, its not poorly coded at all.

Gashman · 8 Jan 2008 at 17:13

why everyone looking for improvements in DX9, try DX10 since thats what needed improving the most

mrk · 8 Jan 2008 at 17:15

Some folk are forgetting that Crytel stated a hundred times that this engine has a shelf life of at least 2-3 years and will bring a GTX to its knees. If Crytek make those statements based on their testing machines then gamers don't stand a chance with current gen hardware.

knowledge123 · 8 Jan 2008 at 17:17

lay-z-boy said:
There was so much hype surrounding this patch and the gains are minimal at best.

Tbh, the only people who hyped it up were the gamers themselves, we've know for a long time that it wouldn't do much.

Robert · 8 Jan 2008 at 17:21

But again, that mentions performance improvements. We are seeing none.

This is the problem. We know the engine is demanding, but they are just talking **** again.

krisboats · 8 Jan 2008 at 17:23

I got the disk checking error too. I want them to give me a new disk, obviously my one i paid £30 for is fake... or maybe buying games is piracy nowadays too.

Robert · 8 Jan 2008 at 17:24

You have to re-install the game

:/