Nope, no big Navi for me or NVidia but I have been objective in both threads and you won't find a single post of me bashing something I don't have in either of those threads.So have you bought the big navi before going to that topic and talk about its RT performance?
I haven't even talked that much about RT i only said the game looks fine to me without RT ( since i don't have a RT card ) and that i will play it if it was playable ( by my standards ). And i talked about some non RT textures that look dumbed down saying that you can do much better than what we see in CP, without RT.
But you can admire the graphics in my videos too soooooo
https://twitter.com/jaygiggy/status/1343961828443897856
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra performance
- Thread starter g67575
- Start date
New forum rules apparently:
You can't comment on something you don't have (even if someone provides some shots or performance charts for the purpose of comparison).
Saying anything slightly negative about something even if it's based on your own experience is bashing or whining.
You can't comment on something you don't have (even if someone provides some shots or performance charts for the purpose of comparison).
Saying anything slightly negative about something even if it's based on your own experience is bashing or whining.
Don't be silly and of course you can. You own the game and I have gave a nod in agreemance with some of the things you have posted but to go on and on and on about something in a detrimental way isn't good for the individual of the forum and it makes even less sense when you don't even own it.
For the record, I hate sprouts but I don't go on the farmers forum and keep on about how yuck they are
(at least it wasn't a car analogy).I do understand the guys who have encountered game breaking bugs being peed off and some will find it amazing looking, where others won't. That's what makes us human!
All you are giving is subjective opinion as a response. My point you keep ignoring is that what is playable for you or me, is unplayable for others. You see another level of immersion and others see a massive FPS impact for insignificant eye candy.
- It is an objective fact that enabling all RT at ultra in CP drops performance by 50% everything else being equal. It is subjective if you prefer the performance or the eye candy.
- It is an objective fact that RT on improves reflections and lighting in CP2077. It is subjective to state it is "life like".
- It is objective fact that that CPDR did a crap job on the stock lighting and screen space reflections based on images I have provided. The water without RT simply looks crap as do quite a few of the other screen space reflection effects.
Last edited:
Caporegime
- Joined
- 8 Jul 2003
- Posts
- 30,063
- Location
- In a house
For the record, I hate sprouts but I don't go on the farmers forum and keep on about how yuck they are
Nowt wrong with sprouts!
Don't be silly and of course you can. You own the game and I have gave a nod in agreemance with some of the things you have posted but to go on and on and on about something in a detrimental way isn't good for the individual of the forum and it makes even less sense when you don't even own it.
For the record, I hate sprouts but I don't go on the farmers forum and keep on about how yuck they are
I do understand the guys who have encountered game breaking bugs being peed off and some will find it amazing looking, where others won't. That's what makes us human!
This thread is about graphics and performance in cyberpunk though.It seems to be okay to repeatedly say how great the game looks and performs but when someone shows it actually doesn't ( in some areas) then the defence arrives.
Even your attempt at humour with the farmers joke suggests we should only comment positively about something or don't comment at all. Let's see who all will take that advice outside of this thread then
Some people say that disabling the hair gives them a nice performance boost. Why is the hair always a problem in CDPR games? Can anyone limit the tessellation again on AMD cards ( something like 8x or 16x ) and see if the FPS improves? Or what is the problem with the hair?
Soldato
- Joined
- 29 Feb 2012
- Posts
- 2,813
- Location
- London
Can I ask what hdr option people are using in this game and the difference between them?
Forgetting all the reflections, I'm surprised how much is changed within the image with RT.
On
Off
Here you go, I've made a comparison slider of your 2 images so all the people saying it only changes reflections can eat their words.
https://imgsli.com/MzU1NjI
RT changes the whole scene, almost everything changes thanks to the realistic lighting/shadowing
Reported this for being off topic and disgusting!Nowt wrong with sprouts!
The issue many like myself have is that it doesn't take RT to get those effects. CP2077 seems to rely on RT to get to the same level other games can manage without RT. Look at the water images I showed earier and tell me it looks as good as any other non-RT game like RDR2 or WDL with RT disabled..
I'm using 1.4 1500 100.
The first number adjusts the gamma, if the blacks look too washed out then lower it down from 2.0.
I had a play about with the nits at 1500 all the reflections were bright and lots of light bouncing around. It looked more life-like on 1000. I prefer it on 1500 with the over the top effects.
Paper white looked best on 100, at stock for me. The highlights really stood out.
The other option would depend on what type of screen you have, some monitors can do one type of HDR and not the other.
Last edited:
Honestly, I prefer the RTX OFF version. The ON version looks weird.
For instance, I don't know why in the RTX ON version the tarmac road in the distance tends towards white? That's not something I've observed in real life.
Or why there's a white glow around the circular tower on the left hand side?
What happens with the white paint to the left of the motorcycle? Is that realistic shadow?
And then this:
He is right, there is nothing in that picture that could not be done using traditional rasterization. Maybe it looks different when in motion but in the picture there is nothing impressive.
It may be the DLSS fault.
Didn't notice that one
Yeah the RTX on version is just plain bizarro there. Takes away the road marking completely as if it was pitch black. That's not even slightly realistic.I don't understand why game devs don't implement a simple effect: the road looks wet in front of the vehicle on a hot day. That will look so awesome in a videogame.
Example:
https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-9d8f130482e3b156ce517c6e2ae2d911-c
Example:
https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-9d8f130482e3b156ce517c6e2ae2d911-c
Last edited:
Caporegime
- Joined
- 8 Jul 2003
- Posts
- 30,063
- Location
- In a house
I'm fairly certain I've seen heat convection in a few games. Couldn't tell you what off the top of my head though -- definitely games with cars in though
Don't bother, HDR is broke in this and there's no way to fix it manually.
It may look like it is working but it's not correctly done i.e. a bit like rdr 2 when it first came out
I know his videos are normally spot on but that is just wrong.
It's the best HDR I have ever seen, doesn't look at all like that video.
His picture is all washed out, this was simply fixed by turning down the first number.
What display do you have?
On my oled, it does look good and like it is working initially but go to any dark/black area and you'll quickly see that something isn't quite right, I've tried messing with all my settings and it still doesn't fix/improve the dark areas part.
Also, this subreddit thread basically confirms it for PC too:
https://www.reddit.com/r/cyberpunkgame/comments/kayprp/pc_hdr_isnt_broken_possible_fix/