it doesn't the lighting is all wrongWhy does the top one look so much better?
it doesn't the lighting is all wrongWhy does the top one look so much better?
Sounds by design. Very good if so.Well I mean, take the Johnny's lines from the trailer...
"How many times you willing to get burned before you stop trusting someone?"
"How many times you gotta take a bullet for these **********ers in the name of empty promises?"
All I could think of was the meltdown at launch lol.
Well I mean, take the Johnny's lines from the trailer...
"How many times you willing to get burned before you stop trusting someone?"
"How many times you gotta take a bullet for these **********ers in the name of empty promises?"
All I could think of was the meltdown at launch lol.
Here we go:Would be interesting to see what the GPUs can manage native mind (albeit no one really plays that way) - DLSS/FSR can skew the results a bit as it isn't a perfect like for like.
That’s a poor showing from a 7900 XTX. So glad I picked up a 3080 Ti for half the price
What's impressive is 44fps max in raster vs 105fps in DLSS. So DLSS 3 frame gen would yield probably more than my monitor's refresh rate of 144fps really even from a 4070 Ti.
Whats that? You upgraded from your 3090 to a 4070 Ti is it?
Await matt to come in going "those are incorrect, I can get 20+% extra performance over that*"
*highly fined tuned best of the best components with liquid metal cooling, fresh windows install and AC unit right beside the PC
Should post that in either the RT, 40xx or better yet, the rdna 3 thread @mrk
CL18, my RAM is 3600MHz but I run it at 3200 because of stability on this BIOS/board with 2 sticks of 32GB modules - I CBA with the tediousness of trying every voltage range and timing etc to get it 100% stable, so I did the next best thing and dropped to 1:1 3200MHz. Noticed zero perf diff in games though so doubt the fps would have been any different in the above. DDR4 4000MHz might have added 2-3fps, but then again what's the point for such measly fps at such extra costIf the Intel system had some slightly better DDR4, it would likely be neck and neck.
3200mhz is pretty slow for alderlake unless the timings are extremely low, that's a doubt though with 64GB.