Yea, I did. I always thought the Demons Souls bell-ringers were quite annoying, too. This is a more compartmentalized reimagining of 3-1, but it still has its own flavor. As do many of the 'throwback' areas in the game. As much as they may throw in fanservice sort of aspects, they rarely ever just rehash it, it's largely redone in an entirely new way.So did anyone actually enjoy Irithyll Dungeon? A poor mans Latria with the most annoying enemies in the series.
Yea, I really did like the design of the boss and her attacks. Very methodic and smooth, yet aggressive, just fury gliding along.
'Dancer' was definitely the right name for the boss.
I eventually just summoned help. 3rd time I've had to do it now and I hate that I had to resort to it, but I just want to move on. I did put a couple more points into Vigor, though. Try and see if I cant shake some of these attacks that others can tank, but kill me outright.
I have finally made it close to the end of the game, after 30 hrs of enjoyable "rage" no pun intended I am now at the nameless king and oh boy is he a tough cookie.
I am maxed out at level 99 with 51 strength around 412 on damage on darksword that's maxed on heavy gem +10, his hits take a lot of damage and now I am burning through ember.
How?
I also think you're probably looking at those games with some rose-tinted glasses. I feel much the same happened with Dark Souls 2. All the sudden, it was super popular to hate on DS2 and people nitpicked every single little detail and proclaimed DS1 to be infinitely better, except that DS1 is highly flawed in many ways, too. But DS1 was many people's first foray into the Souls series and thus they have cherished memories from it and overlooked many of its flaws. Something they couldn't do with DS2 because it wasn't as fresh anymore. Not that DS2 doesn't have many ways that is actually is lesser than DS1, but people weren't giving it a fair comparison in many cases.I feel like my experience was somewhat soured by the fact that in the back of my mind I was always referencing and comparing it to other Souls games.
I also think you're probably looking at those games with some rose-tinted glasses. I feel much the same happened with Dark Souls 2. All the sudden, it was super popular to hate on DS2 and people nitpicked every single little detail and proclaimed DS1 to be infinitely better, except that DS1 is highly flawed in many ways, too. But DS1 was many people's first foray into the Souls series and thus they have cherished memories from it and overlooked many of its flaws. Something they couldn't do with DS2 because it wasn't as fresh anymore. Not that DS2 doesn't have many ways that is actually is lesser than DS1, but people weren't giving it a fair comparison in many cases.
So far, I'm thinking that Dark Souls 3 might well be the best of the bunch so far.
Do you do damage though when parrying or am I understanding it wrong?
I think there's a reason DS3 is based mainly on the same foundation as DS1, it's because DS1 is a masterpiece. I cannot play DS2 now, I'm playing a DS1 save and DS3. No rose tinted glasses, DS2 was a poor effort on many fronts, which prevent it from being a masterpiece. imo.