David Cameron looking to ban gay kisses...

Retromatic · 3 May 2011 at 18:56

Couldn't care less. I used to kiss men in public all the time, on the whole.

hurfdurf · 3 May 2011 at 18:58

FoxEye said:
You don't seem like an impartial source. I'm sure studies have been conducted (by gay rights groups), that show kids raised in same-sex couples are fitter, smarter, happier, more likely to become president, etc, etc.

But I wonder what the reality in the schools is like?

Care to say why I'm impartial?

Do you not understand what peer reviewed means? These are reports bought out by sociologists from Universities interested in nothing but the science behind society. None of them have funding from any gay rights groups :confused:

Once again, a homophobic person not understanding something, the pattern continues!

Energize · 3 May 2011 at 18:58

I thought Labour were totalitarian but Cameron seems even worse! At least Brown wasn't homophobic.

hurfdurf · 3 May 2011 at 19:01

I always seem to be the one left posting at the end of these kinds of threads, perhaps it is because my posts on the subject are just too good for homophobes to handle. It is a mystery to me why I am not a mod or at least a man of honour?! Instead I get banned for trolling. I feel like Jesus* some times

*not supporting the idea of the fairy tail that is Jesus was correct as understood by most.

^TANK^ · 3 May 2011 at 19:09

As long as it doesn't involve parenting they can stand and and bang to their hearts content, I couldn't careless what two consenting adults do!

RomanNose · 3 May 2011 at 19:11

I thought we were supposed to be going forwards not backwards.

hurfdurf · 3 May 2011 at 19:14

^TANK^ said:
As long as it doesn't involve parenting they can stand and and bang to their hearts content, I couldn't careless what two consenting adults do!

Why can it not involve parenting?

Creelers · 3 May 2011 at 19:19

Skyfall said:
Does it really matter, no good TV has gay kisses in anyway.

The Wire.

Your opinion is now void for eternity.

^TANK^ · 3 May 2011 at 19:20

hurfdurf said:
Why can it not involve parenting?

Children need structure not confusion, thats not me saying you can be turned gay as thats not the case, you're born that way. I believe in an ideal world a mother and a father play a strong roll in nurturing.

hurfdurf · 3 May 2011 at 19:34

^TANK^ said:
Children need structure not confusion, thats not me saying you can be turned gay as thats not the case, you're born that way. I believe in an ideal world a mother and a father play a strong roll in nurturing.

And in an ideal world we would all have a mother and father and everyone would be happy. In the real world there are many single parents, abusive parents and kids who have been abandoned and are living in a hell hole shelter.

A homosexual household is much more preferable for these kids when the ideal genetic mother and/or father is not available for what ever reason. Especially if you read the thread and read the published articles done looking in to how homosexual and happy the kids are. I will repeat it just for you because you are super swole.

Peer reviewed studies have shown time and time again that children are just as happy and well of if not more with homosexual parents than the conventional heterosexual genetic parents and they are no more likely to turn out homosexual themselves.

So again, how come you don't want parenting involved?

^TANK^ · 3 May 2011 at 19:38

hurfdurf said:
So again, how come you don't want parenting involved?

I've have answered that already for you, thats where I stand and It'll never change.

hurfdurf · 3 May 2011 at 19:43

^TANK^ said:
I've have answered that already for you, thats where I stand and It'll never change.

So you would rather children suffer in care homes than be provided with a loving and caring home, with evidence to back up the fact that they will be unaffected by having homosexual parents? Odd to say the least.

Would you let single parents adopt? That too is not the ideal and with your incorrect logic lead to confusion and not provide what you class as "structure"

I understand its not ideal, but sadly not everyone can have ideal in the real world, so I do not understand how that is a reasoning for not letting homosexuals adopt. That is why I am repeating the question.

Twentyone · 3 May 2011 at 19:48

FoxEye said:
But I wonder what the reality in the schools is like?

But school is only hell because the kids there have grown up with views that its wrong.

One kid in my class grew up with gay parents (two men, mother took off when he was 1 and got a new father when he was 3) and he is completely "fine" by homophobic standards. As for the school environment, we couldn't really care less if he had two dads.. Neither could our parents.

I really am happy that I grew up somewhere where we didn't have problems with peoples sexuality.

Tefal · 3 May 2011 at 19:48

simulatorman said:
Says the man who cries when he gets drunk.

At least I don't puke

Tefal · 3 May 2011 at 19:51

^TANK^ said:
I believe in an ideal world a mother and a father play a strong roll in nurturing.

so if you cant give both give neither?

NeoReloaded · 3 May 2011 at 20:00

BAN THE QUEERS!!

Morba · 3 May 2011 at 20:33

krooton said:
In my ideal world I would want my children to grow up being good people. Their sexuality, if they choose to have kids, none of that is important. Happy and healthy, and to live their lives how they choose.

Kids are not employees that need to grow up following your exact plan lest they be 'fired'.

+1 to that

Tefal · 3 May 2011 at 20:37

PMKeates said:
Holy WOW. Since when did you discover the meaning of life? Go you!

All those philosophers are gonna be glad you saved them a lifetime of pondering.

he is kinda right though, the "point" of us is to ****, multiply and die.

In many ways life is like a road trip to Scunthorpe, enjoy the journey, cause you sure as **** aren't going to enjoy the destination.

Cosimo · 3 May 2011 at 20:41

Tefal said:
At least I don't puke

We only have your word for that.

FoxEye · 3 May 2011 at 20:43

hurfdurf said:
Once again, a homophobic person not understanding something, the pattern continues!

Heh. As it happens I'm not especially homophobic.

But do answer me this (and getting back on topic). Do gay people honestly believe, that if you expose a straight individual to enough gay imagery (TV, pride marches, whatever), that you will erode that basic "ewww!" reaction that we instinctively have when watching gay people touching, kissing, holding hands?

Because like it or not, and whether we choose to express those feelings or not, a lot of straight people will *always* have that reaction.

And what's with the increasingly aggressive stance of (some) gay activists. Like taking small guest house owners to court because they wouldn't rent them a room. Some of us deeply sympathise with that guest house owner, if he didn't want a gay couple sharing a bed in his house. But that's another thread.