David Cameron looking to ban gay kisses...

Probably because Lesbians are not quite as aggressive in their sexuality as Gay Men, as a rule.

I think you will find that all men, regardless of their sexuality, are aggressive about it. ;)

"PHWOAR!!! Look at the jubblies on that one! Alright darling, can I get fries with that shake?!!?" *wolf whistle*

That makes me feel WAY more uncomfortable than two dudes kissing.
 
I think you will find that all men, regardless of their sexuality, are aggressive about it. ;)

"PHWOAR!!! Look at the jubblies on that one! Alright darling, can I get fries with that shake?!!?" *wolf whistle*

That makes me feel WAY more uncomfortable than two dudes kissing.

Not all, some do it quietly
attachment_3.jpg
 
Of course.

Its not very common on the whole, therefore I wouldn't consider it part of the 'norm', in the way you mean it.

I don't think any less of someone because they are gay (unless they are one of those in your face, camp as christmas types) but its not something I would consider normal in the same way I consider heterosexual stuff as normal.
It's very difficult to approximate what is common with regards to sexuality. Millions of people in the UK identify as being gay, and that's in addition to the probably larger number who would consider themselves straight, if pushed, yet have some homosexual interest or curiosity. The rate of some homosexuality is probably quite high.

The normal is the expected. It is a known fact some people are gay, and therefore it is not abnormal for them to be gay.
 
Trouble is that 'gay' is seemingly promoted as a trend and cool. You HAVE to have a 'token gay' (or several) in order to make your programme valid nowadays.

I have no problem with those that are gay, but I don't personally believe it is right. I don't want my kid being exposed to it on TV (or anywhere else), regardless of what the law says.

I want my child to grow up with their own idea on sexuality, not something that is promoted/sold/marketted at them. I'll not force my idea's on them either, but I will try to teach them right from wrong as I see it.

The human race is the male + female combo and I don't personally feel that male + male or female + female is the right thing to be supporting. The race will survive with male and female, but will not survive if everyone was gay, and to me, that just says that being gay is wrong. Once again, I hold nothing against those that are gay, but my views differ.

I should not be criminalised for thinking this way either, which is what it is rapidly going towards.

EDIT: BTW, those that are going W00T! to lesbian stuff... think you've just been watching to much pr0n ;-)
 
Last edited:
Isn't the incidence of homosexuality about the same as the incidence of left-handedness?

Left-handed people are not normal. You heard it here first.

Yep. Also ginger people are getting less and less in numbers, making them not normal.
So, should you happen to find a ginger left handed person you can expect them to be completely not normal.

Unfortunately, I am left handed and ginger. Damn :(
 
Yep. Also ginger people are getting less and less in numbers, making them not normal.
So, should you happen to find a ginger left handed person you can expect them to be completely not normal.

Unfortunately, I am left handed and ginger. Damn :(

I'm going to write to David Camerson to request that you not be allowed to appear on TV before 9pm.
 
I think Dave has got it right again ..

You try explaining two men kissing on the telly to your 7yeard old , its just not natural and needs to be banned .

Call me homophobic are whatever the word is its just not mother natures way.
 
The human race is the male + female combo and I don't personally feel that male + male or female + female is the right thing to be supporting. The race will survive with male and female, but will not survive if everyone was gay, and to me, that just says that being gay is wrong.

Do you feel the same way about straight couples who choose not to have kids, or physically cannot?

The world is overpopulated as it is, maybe homosexuality is on the increase as the world's own homeostasis.
 
Trouble is that 'gay' is seemingly promoted as a trend and cool. You HAVE to have a 'token gay' (or several) in order to make your programme valid nowadays.
The 'token gay' is only present as much as the 'token black' here or the 'token Mexican' in the US. It's more an attempt to appeal to those sections of society than anything more sinister.
I have no problem with those that are gay, but I don't personally believe it is right. I don't want my kid being exposed to it on TV (or anywhere else), regardless of what the law says.
If you don't want you child to be exposed to homosexuality, then that is your choice. I think it's a bad one to make as a parent. The world is the world, and homosexuality is a part of it. Understanding is better than ignorance. Ignorance is what has created the conditions for rampant persecution for all manner of reasons. Your child will grow up to understand homosexuality and there is simply nothing you can do about it, unless you want to lock them away forever.
I want my child to grow up with their own idea on sexuality, not something that is promoted/sold/marketted at them. I'll not force my idea's on them either, but I will try to teach them right from wrong as I see it.
I think letting them grow up with their own ideas is the best thing, too. However, ideas are born from experience and inspiration, and by intentionally not exposing them to homosexuality you are effectively making a determination for them that homosexuality is wrong. You cannot say that you are letting them make their own decisions and then present them with options you have pre-filtered.
The human race is the male + female combo and I don't personally feel that male + male or female + female is the right thing to be supporting. The race will survive with male and female, but will not survive if everyone was gay, and to me, that just says that being gay is wrong. Once again, I hold nothing against those that are gay, but my views differ.
The risk of human race ending because of homosexuality is nil. Homosexuality will not suddenly gain a 100% prevalence rate because it's openly accepted. Homosexuality has existed probably at the current rate for a very long time, it has only recently become more visible.
I think Dave has got it right again ..

You try explaining two men kissing on the telly to your 7yeard old , its just not natural and needs to be banned .

Call me homophobic are whatever the word is its just not mother natures way.
What makes it different to explaining a man and a woman kissing to a 7 year old? Have you discovered a way to impart the feelings love and sexuality to your children before they have experienced them?
 
Who really cares, I don't particularly care for watching men snogging full on whether on TV or in Public, it makes me feel uncomfortable. However hetero couples going at it in public makes me fell uncomfortable as well, although it doesn't particularly bother me on TV.

I can always turn the TV over if I don't want to watch it.

+1

Much the same i feel...i dont watch a lot of TV but meh who really cares in the grand scheme of things.
 
Back
Top Bottom