ArmA 3 graphics aren't that great mate, plenty of games beat it, by a lot too. The games pretty damn ugly in some areas and mediocre in the rest.
You're playing a different Arma3 to me then as it looks stunning and runs well.
ArmA 3 graphics aren't that great mate, plenty of games beat it, by a lot too. The games pretty damn ugly in some areas and mediocre in the rest.
few changes its on a new engine
A dated engine, also in the dev video of the standalone I wasn't impressed, it looked to play pretty much the same to me, the new loot feature is good with it being hidden behind objects and stuff though.
From a combat technical point of view, 3rd person is bad and for that reason I'm out.
How do people manage in other games in first person without 3rd person for motion sickness, I cant see how its any different to scanning around in 1st person. Seems like a poor excuse to like 3ding over walls.
Gotta love all the effort that goes into the realism of the original game (arma) and then allowing people to have an outer body experience.
inb4zombiesarentreal
Thought exactly the same thing, if you want realism you have to get rid of the 3rd person option (someone said in the arma3 thread that it can be removed server side which is at least an option). It makes no sense to have it in this type of game where you can basically look over walls and around corners lol