Derek Chauvin murder trial (Police officer who arrested George Floyd)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Permabanned
Joined
13 Mar 2020
Posts
627
I think there is no way they acquitted him, especially as they reached verdict so fast. The media and societal pressure is beyond, no way jury is not afraid of repercussions.

EDIT:

I take that back, they deliberated for what total of 8 hours?? Well this is going to be interesting.
 
Caporegime
OP
Joined
29 Jan 2008
Posts
58,933
This was my estimate - clearly I was massively wrong re: a mistrial (mostly considering a hung jury there than a judge decision though the latter did come a bit close at the end), I wonder if I'm going to be massively wrong re: manslaughter too now:

My current thinking re: the chances of the various outcomes from the jury is:

second-degree murder: 5%
third-degree murder: 15%
second-degree manslaughter: 35%
mistrial: 35%
not guilty: 10%

Given the speed of the verdict, I think I'd revise the above a bit... essentially squashing the distribution down to give a bit more weight to the extremes.
 
Soldato
Joined
29 Dec 2014
Posts
5,809
Location
Midlands
This was my estimate - clearly I was massively wrong re: a mistrial (mostly considering a hung jury there than a judge decision though the latter did come a bit close at the end), I wonder if I'm going to be massively wrong re: manslaughter too now:

I had roughly the same sorts of prediction.

Although - they only deliberated for around 10 hours, could the even find him guilty of murder 2 and consider everything else in that time? it seems really fast.
 
Soldato
Joined
19 Oct 2007
Posts
3,684
Location
Delete *.*
This was my estimate - clearly I was massively wrong re: a mistrial (mostly considering a hung jury there than a judge decision though the latter did come a bit close at the end), I wonder if I'm going to be massively wrong re: manslaughter too now:



Given the speed of the verdict, I think I'd revise the above a bit... essentially squashing the distribution down to give a bit more weight to the extremes.

I'd be shocked if it's not manslaughter or not guilty
 
Soldato
Joined
17 Jul 2007
Posts
24,529
Location
Solihull-Florida
OMG, they've reached a verdict already!!!!

That was quicker than I thought, I wonder perhaps if they have gone with a murder conviction then!

I was expecting some arguing with the majority going for manslaughter... but a quicker verdict and I'm now wondering about one of the extremes, murder or not guilty!


They took 2 hours to find simpson not guilty I think.
 
Permabanned
Joined
13 Mar 2020
Posts
627
'Jurors deliberated for four hours on Monday and resumed deliberating this morning at 8 a.m. CT (9 a.m. ET). The court did not specify in the notice when jurors stopped deliberating today' CNN

Why is everyone here thinking they reached decision fast? Is that still considered extremely quickly for jury deliberations?
 
Sgarrista
Commissario
Joined
9 Aug 2013
Posts
10,490
Location
Bromsgrove
'Jurors deliberated for four hours on Monday and resumed deliberating this morning at 8 a.m. CT (9 a.m. ET). The court did not specify in the notice when jurors stopped deliberating today' CNN

Why is everyone here thinking they reached decision fast?

The number of witnesses and the huge amount of evidence.
 
Soldato
Joined
30 Apr 2006
Posts
17,993
Location
London
When will they announce it then?

Looks like in about 20 mins (9:30pm GMT)

I hope the police crunches down on any rioting tonight whatever the verdict is. I'm sick to bloody death of people taking advantage of the situation to cause anarchy and steal stuff whenever they see the opportunity.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom