Explain that away and maybe I'll consider a shakey cam (an effect which can easily be added in editing) as proof that it's a fake, staged conspiracy.
Why does it have to be "staged conspiracy"? It's a scripted TV show. You don't look at Top Gear and scream "conspiracy", we all except it as being scripted and staged for our fun and entertainment. It's not like the crew members and actors have some sort of huge secret to burst out into the public view, they sit quiet because their contract says so and enjoy our discussions about it being real or fake because that was the whole point of it - illusionist trick on TV that generates a lot of noise around it.
Zborniak said:
We have Derren who will have undoubtedly told his friends and family after a few drinks. The fact that the lead was a actor is after all, the biggest part of the show.
We also have Derren's manager, publicist and PR firm who will have all colluded with him to release the propaganda where he states that Steven is not an actor.
On the other hand, you have screenshots from Steve's Facebook account and actors profile all over the internet (before profile was locked). There are also odd scheduling clashes, where Steve's facebook pics put him at one of the music festivals at the time when dates printed on the screen during show suggest he should be already watched at home prior to "apocalypse".
We have the writers and producers who are of course all in on it as they write Steven's lines as well finding him and paying him. They will of course have told other people about their fantastic plan to fool the nation. TV producers aren't introverts without egos.
What you described above is not odd in any way. Happens all the time. Cast, crew and producers don't always leak TV series plots, set ups or filming locations. You sign the agreement, your job and future employment depends on these things. In fact, in entertainment industry, when someone does leak something, it's more often part of PR machine than drunken blabbing in a pub or letting your friends in on a secret.
Then we have Equity, the actors union who will have been consulted for a contract with Steven. If they hadn't then the production would get into big trouble for having a lead actor in a prime time terrestrial show with no relation to Equity and the union would make sure that the producers and production company never get's an easy ride ever again. So, Equity needs to keep schtum.
You don't have to go through union if he wasn't signed actor. But in the same line of thinking - do you think any company, studio or channel would insure, produce or sign off on a TV show where lead character is unaware of the setup and at any moment within split of a second could panic surrounded by "zombies", and with one swift jump into the ambulance or single swing of a piece of wood or a pipe create newspaper headlines before anyone from production crew could reach the location from the monitoring room?
We of course have Steven who will have friends, family and randomers (old school mates, friends-of-friends) on Facebook will have all seen him on telly. None of them will sell their story to the tabloids as apparently everyone is great a keeping a secret that they haven't even been told to keep.
They kind of did, the people not involved in production. Wasn't it how the twitter, Facebook pics surfaced?
It nearly goes without saying the Steven will never get work as an actor again (nor had he before).
Why not? His contract will probably be up in a year and by that time no one will care? There were professional, published musicians stooged into talent shows and singing competitions before, in the end, nobody cares. You do the show, your contract ends, you go back to your daily job.
Then we've got the actors who played the other characters in the post-apocalypse world. They will of course have mingled with each other between takes and most likely will have met Steven at the rehearsals.
What would be easier - trick the extras into thinking the main character is unaware of the setup or trick random dude into thinking England was taken over by zombies?
We then have the actors who played his family. They are all unknowns who have suddenly been spotted on TV by their connections which will total into the hundreds. We have the premises owner of the house where the fake family lived. But of course that would have been one of the actors' house or someone from the production.
You are overthinking this. It happens all the time, in almost every rouge traders episode at the lowest of budgets - random filming location, random set of people for one day shoot. In fact there are a lot of pointers of it being one day shoot. In the house footage in first episode Steven wears the same clothes and holds the same pint in what was meant to be secret filming weeks apart.
Then we've got the crew. Camera, lighting, sound, art department, extras, catering, make-up and costume probably telling their friends and family too, post production team of loggers (watching all footage and noting down occurances), assistant editors, the editor and the sound mixing team. Let's hope they all keep quiet.
Not disclosure agreement. It's not any different to hundreds of people involved in production not revealing the end of "Lost", or the plot of Star Wars movies. And the stakes are much higher on those occasions.