Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 30,845
Yeah, the one labelled 'Off'Someone on PCMR just asked what FSR mode is best to use for image quality in Alan Wake 2....
Oh dear oh dear.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
DLSS Momentum Continues: 50 Released and Upcoming DLSS 3 Games, Over 250 DLSS Games and Creative Apps Available Now
- Thread starter Nexus18
- Start date
Man of Honour
Hold hat thought, Ratchet & Clank is so far my number one with essentially zero visual flaws - Alan Wake 2 is amazing, but it has some flaws in its rendering that are visible upon scrutinuy, but Ratchet I had a very hard time finding anything wrong with the graphics, in most cases it looks better than a Pixar movie lol.
Hard to pick a single game for the best visuals though as they are all different games and have different art styles as well as setting out to achieve different things. No doubt:
- ratchet
- aw 2
- cp 2077
- portal rtx
Are the best games visually though, even without RT (obviously excluding portal since it is a remixed PT title)
I would say hogwarts is still incredible looking too with just how much detail there is in that game world, same with a Plague Tale Requiem
Last edited:
Man of Honour
Hogwarts? That's one of my least fav games for visuals!
Better than Starfield though.
Better than Starfield though.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 May 2007
- Posts
- 10,148
I thought the visuals in Hogwarts were perfect and done a great job of capturing the wizarding world. They might not be the best ever but done what they were supposed to do.
Caporegime
The art style in games is still massive outside of the technical wonders like properly done RT/PT.
Hogwarts definitely seemed to capture the atmosphere quite well and had some stop and stare moments.
Hogwarts definitely seemed to capture the atmosphere quite well and had some stop and stare moments.
He probably only played it at potato 1440p and did not run it at 2160p via DLDSR like I suggested.
The difference was night and day too.
Last edited:
Man of Honour
I actually did play it at 5160x2160 
And no there is no difference in the visual quality in that game. Cyberpunk is the only game (and ratchet) where I have actually had to sit back and just admire the overall density and quality of the visuals on nearly every play session.
And no there is no difference in the visual quality in that game. Cyberpunk is the only game (and ratchet) where I have actually had to sit back and just admire the overall density and quality of the visuals on nearly every play session.
Man of Honour
In Hogwarts? No there really wasn't lol. Maybe some minor changes to levels of AA due to compacting a denser pixel output to a display with a native res much smaller (expected since it's the main benefit of DLDSR), but apart from that the game looked identical, I even posted screenshots (for the pov of seeing if there were better graphical details at DLDSR) at the time. And to date I have not seen a single review outlining a huge difference at 4K vs 1440P in Hogwarts either.
Anyways, it's a crap engine as it still has traversal stutters and inconsistent CPU usage so nothing else really matters as far as that game goes lol.
Anyways, it's a crap engine as it still has traversal stutters and inconsistent CPU usage so nothing else really matters as far as that game goes lol.
Last edited:
Yes Hogwarts.
Cannot trust your eyes no more @mrk
Pretty sure Nexus noticed what I did too.
To me it was THE game that made me think thank god for DLDSR. I was so underwhelmed by the graphics in Hogwarts until I enabled it.
All I can think of is some people sit really far away from their display and therefore resolution does not make the difference for them. Some here sit double the distance I do as I recall
Cannot trust your eyes no more @mrk
Pretty sure Nexus noticed what I did too.
To me it was THE game that made me think thank god for DLDSR. I was so underwhelmed by the graphics in Hogwarts until I enabled it.
All I can think of is some people sit really far away from their display and therefore resolution does not make the difference for them. Some here sit double the distance I do as I recall
Last edited:
This guys channel has pretty good comparisons, crazy how far the lower presets of dlss have come along, meanwhile fsr 2 not improving at all.
Man of Honour
Yeah FSR is toilet.
You know I will re download Hogwarts and post fresh screenshots showing zero difference
Yes Hogwarts.
Cannot trust your eyes no more @mrk
Pretty sure Nexus noticed what I did too.
To me it was THE game that made me think thank god for DLDSR. I was so underwhelmed by the graphics in Hogwarts until I enabled it.
All I can think of is some people sit really far away from their display and therefore resolution does not make the difference for them. Some here sit double the distance I do as I recall
You know I will re download Hogwarts and post fresh screenshots showing zero difference
Last edited:
Soldato
Hmm an NVIDIA technical partnership making fsr2.2 look bad. Shock horror. Just saying I do often wonder if some of this is done on purpose. I mean who'd do a technical partnership if it accidentally made a competitor technology more preferable right. No fsr 3 in Alan wake 2?
Alan Wake 2: FSR 2.2 vs. DLSS 3.5 Comparison Review
Alan Wake 2 is the second game to receive full support for NVIDIA's DLSS 3.5, which includes support for NVIDIA's DLSS Ray Reconstruction, Super Resolution, Frame Generation and DLAA. Also supported is AMD's FidelityFX Super Resolution. In this mini-review we compare the image quality and...www.techpowerup.com
Oooooooooooooof