Well, I hope James Bond doesn't go back down the "slapstick" route again to be honest.
Well, I hope James Bond doesn't go back down the "slapstick" route again to be honest.
Really not seeing the problem here, she's a decent actress, as long as she gets some good scripts.
This "I'm not sexist but...." meltdown going on here and elsewhere is quite telling about a lot of folk though.
Supposedly the new lead always wanted to cast a woman. This is what annoys me the most is that he has cut half of the possibilities before he even started. It seems like he's chosen a woman just for the sake of it. I suspect because the show is failing and this is the last chance to save it.
Supposedly Jodie only has a one series contact.
It was always unlikely that the Doctor would continue to be white and male, especially as the BBC has committed itself to greater diversity on its programmes.
surprised it's not an ethnic minority doctor seeing as it's the bbc and how they like to represent equality by advertising jobs that white people can't apply for, or tried to one time anywayMore surprised she wasn't a wheelchair bound, feminist, transgender minority, with an assistant who had recently went through a sex change and was recently protesting for transgender toilets. Or something along those lines...
Well, no. They're changing because of a preference of what they're changing to. They're not changing just because they like to make changes.So there you go. Change for change's sake.
Well, no. They're changing because of a preference of what they're changing to. They're not changing just because they like to make changes.
Yeah, fine. It's not changing for change's sake then, is it?The new lead has literally said he wanted it to be a woman from the beginning.
Yeah, fine. It's not changing for change's sake then, is it?
It's changing because he sees 'his' doctor as a woman
I'm disputing your "a change for change's sake"BBC says they want more diversity. New show lead conveniently wants a woman to be the lead. Lead hires woman he knows. Can you not see it?
I'm disputing your "a change for change's sake"
It's possibly a change for diversity's sake. It might possibly be a change for artistic vision's sake, or for publicity's sake. But they're certainly not changing just because they like change.
And deciding to definitely stick with a man for the role wouldn't have locked out half the possibles?Supposedly the new lead always wanted to cast a woman. This is what annoys me the most is that he has cut half of the possibilities before he even started. It seems like he's chosen a woman just for the sake of it. I suspect because the show is failing and this is the last chance to save it.
Supposedly Jodie only has a one series contact.
Cry more.The next Dr should be a black, lesbian, paraplegic that should tick all the boxes.
Dont' get it - typo - Try more, or the doctor should cry more ?Cry more.
maybe USA or worldwide distributors (even netflix?) have some input on the choice ?Well the whole objective really is chasing ratings
you mean casting couch (Corbyn/Diane), or ... Yentob and CamilaCan you not see it?
I don't see the problem. It's not Mr Who and there don't appear to be any ties to the doctor having to be a male other than her predecessors all being male.
From the little I've seen of her she seems to be a good actress so lets all hope she knows how to drive the tardis or the series will be short lived.