Donald Trump

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Obama administration also put aid on hold, what's you point?

The fun thing with evidence, is that you are supposed to put it together with other evidence to understand or prove what happened. This, put together with everything else we know, is even more damning for Trump.
 
So I/we have somehow convinced the mods to ban people despite them not breaking said rules?

I don't have time to sift through all the crazy posts in the SC thread but there were several posts asking mods to ban/block people.

Some of the people (one guy who was actually american) got banned/blocked.

How can it be a CT if it actually happened.

You are simply lying that it didn't happen.
 
But you're still implying we have sway over the mods. If they banned you/others - suggests you broke the rules/provide nothing to SC.
 
Don't know, but they did withhold a lot of money to ensure the Biden's were not investigated over their involvement with a corrupt Ukrainian Gas company. :)
So post up some proof of Obama doing such a thing to ensure the Bidens weren’t investigated over Burisma, as that is the name of the gas company in Ukraine ;).
See this is where you fail so hard, you refuse to point blank post proof of the things you say. Then you have the audacity to start calling others out on it.
 
Which means you're questioning the mod's integrity. The word "ban" appears 60 times in the Trump SC thread since December 2018 and it doesn't look like once do they relate to what you're suggesting (guns, American policy etc.).

So which is it? People asked for people to be banned and the mods complied without reasoning. Or the mods did so because they had reason?
 
Don't know, but they did withhold a lot of money to ensure the Biden's were not investigated over their involvement with a corrupt Ukrainian Gas company. :)

They did? Gosh. Perhaps then they should be impeached? I love how Trump supporters always resort to "but,but,but so and so did it and they got away with it" as if that should mean this person should be let off scott free. It's normally when they have run out of Trump "alt truths" to regurgitate.

On that basis then Plasmahal, if anybody ever got away with murder, nobody should ever be tried with murder again I assume?

Or perhaps, you finish with this case and lock Trump up and then you investigate the Biden case and try him later?
 
I said the administration.. Now who lacks basic English language skills.
So again deflecting like you normally do.

Obama was in charge of the administration at the time so answer the question for a change. You posted something again and still fail to answer the question.

You by far suffer from TDS, it’s quite pathetic really to see a 50 yr old resort to childish behaviour.
 
mmm, just got 10 times worse now you are here.... :)

Clearly you got bored over in SC, has the echo chamber gone quiet?
Actually no over there we have a decent discussion about Trump rather than having to deal with the likes of you and your ignorance and childish behaviour.

Or are you just massively butthurt that you have been banned from SC and can’t spread any more of your misinformation, deflections and general ignorance about the American political system and how impeachment works?? Because based on what you have posted and keep posting, I find it hard to believe that you have any knowledge of how the impeachment process works.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom