I'm new here but not to the problem, having a GT72s 6QE-045UK (980M) I received a valuation last year (11 mths old, pristine) of £1049! I have heard nothing from MSI regarding any 'recalculation', even though it is quite apparent that my offer is considerably less than others have been offered, in some cases it seems for lower spec machines!
I also find it unacceptable that the resale of my 980M card is not (at least evidently) implimented as part of their calculation.
It is further unacceptable that this manufacturer is insisting on their own arbitary SRP's when there resellers are consistently, and significantly, offering there product at a lower price.
And, it is unacceptable to expect customers to trade-in at these inflated prices for a lower spec (GT72VR, HM170) machine without due compensation or a reasonable reduction for a more suitable replacement (GT73VR, CM236)
For those thinking otherwise; it is irrelavant that the latter option entails MSI supplying a higher specification machine to enable a suitable trade-in. It is irrelavant because that cost should be carried by them, not the consumer. MSI are the engineers of this calamity and it is therefore their responsibility, and duty, to put right what they made wrong.
And, before it is mentioned, it matters not that this may not be a problem of their making (i.e. Nvida changed the format/protocol, etc), the duty remains with them. They supplied machines which, it was claimed, have upgradable graphics performance via a replaceable video card. This is, in factor so it turns out, not the case and our versions of the GT series of notbooks are, therefore, not fit for purpose in this (important) respect.
As such, we may well be due compensation beyond a suitable replacement for the not inconsiderable inconvenience involved in this trade-in program as opposed to the relatively simple process of swapping out graphics card.
Just my opinion, of course, but I thought it might be useful for another owner to throw his twopence worth in.