Malevolence tried to claim these issues hadn't been compounded by leaving the EU by parroting JRM's statements about it being the fault of the French, for not allowing UK tourists to use eGates. He went as far as calling them dicks as a result.
It took me 30 seconds on Google to find out that wasn't necessarily true, with an article quoting the boss of Dover port who says that eGates don't exist at Dover and are currently impractical in that environment anyway, so I countered. I didn't insult, or belittle, or condescend him. Are you saying that I am the one adding toxicity to the debate, simply because I voted remain? Rather than the person throwing insults?
Is that where we are now? I feel like any sort of discussion, no matter how honestly presented, it being hand-waved away as "toxicity" or "saltiness", just because people don't want to hear it. Why are people so emotionally attached to this thing that they voted for, that they feel completely unable to accept any criticism of it? I voted remain but I'm okay with acknowledging the advantages of leaving when they appear. Why cant leavers be the same with acknowledging the disadvantages? If we truly want to move on, then we are going to need to discuss these topics openly so as to come up with solutions.