Dr. Disrespect permanently banned from Twitch

.Lethal said:
Sexting with a minor with intent to meetup at Twitchcon. No evidence to back it up, but it's got a lot of people in the industry responding and seems like this might be it.

Click to expand...

So the guy who tweeted it was former account director of strategic partnerships at twitch, so they’d definitely be in the know about why, not like it was some low level imp, this is gonna be very interesting to see unfold
 
antijoke said:
So the guy who tweeted it was former account director of strategic partnerships at twitch, so they’d definitely be in the know about why, not like it was some low level imp, this is gonna be very interesting to see unfold
Click to expand...

@DrDisrespect
Jake seriously... I get it, its a hot topic but this has been settled, no wrongdoing was acknowledged and they paid out the whole contract.
Click to expand...

ooof
 
antijoke said:
So the guy who tweeted it was former account director of strategic partnerships at twitch, so they’d definitely be in the know about why, not like it was some low level imp, this is gonna be very interesting to see unfold
Click to expand...

It was never interesting to start with. I can't believe people even watch this stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TNA
antijoke said:
So the guy who tweeted it was former account director of strategic partnerships at twitch, so they’d definitely be in the know about why, not like it was some low level imp, this is gonna be very interesting to see unfold
Click to expand...

Yeah, and their talking about it now allegedly because a 4 year non-disclosure agreement just expired.
 
Raumarik said:
Zero evidence, claims on social media are worthless.
Click to expand...

In a court of law.

But the way people choose to reply to an allegation can lean in favour or away from an allegation.

You don't have to reply to someone talking trash about you. But when you do reply and it's vague then you've volunteered that there's truth in the accusation and you're not willing to state you're clean.

If an NDA just expired I'm thinking he doesn't dare give a full straight denial and he doesn't dare ignore it either because it's a person who really knows the details.
 
Last edited:
Hotwired said:
In a court of law.

But the way people choose to reply to an allegation can lean in favour or away from an allegation.

You don't have to reply to someone talking trash about you. But when you do reply and it's vague then you've volunteered that there's truth in the accusation and you're not willing to state you're clean.

If an NDA just expired I'm thinking he doesn't dare give a full straight denial and he doesn't dare ignore it either because it's a person who really knows the details.
Click to expand...
I have no idea what you are talking about. There's zero evidence being given, I don't really care about this situation at all but anything twitch staff say I'm going to assume is slanted from the perspective of people working at a very questionable company with dubious morals. I'm certainly not going to immediately assume guilt on the other side regardless of the response.

Doc, who I'm not a fan of by any means hasn't really addressed it from what little I've seen. It just screams "slow news week" on the drama channels at this point.
 
So if the dude was doing something suspect with minors are Twitch not obliged by law to report it to the police? Cant see how you can get away with something like via a deal tbh
 
Raumarik said:
I have no idea what you are talking about. There's zero evidence being given, I don't really care about this situation at all but anything twitch staff say I'm going to assume is slanted from the perspective of people working at a very questionable company with dubious morals. I'm certainly not going to immediately assume guilt on the other side regardless of the response.

Doc, who I'm not a fan of by any means hasn't really addressed it from what little I've seen. It just screams "slow news week" on the drama channels at this point.
Click to expand...

What are you on about.

Someone who isn't a nobody made a statement of fact and it hit Doc enough to reply without denying it.

Politicians reply like this every single day to give a non-reply to the question. But you can't non-reply without showing some of your hand, generally about what specifics you won't clarify.
 
Drizmod said:
So if the dude was doing something suspect with minors are Twitch not obliged by law to report it to the police? Cant see how you can get away with something like via a deal tbh
Click to expand...

That's what I thought too but the ban happened before Twitchcon, no meeting took place and I'd guess he had a good enough legal team to fight this.

Doc ended up getting paid the rest of his twitch contract in exchange for him leaving Twitch, that much has been confirmed himself.
 
.Lethal said:
That's what I thought too but the ban happened before Twitchcon, no meeting took place and I'd guess he had a good enough legal team to fight this.

Doc ended up getting paid the rest of his twitch contract in exchange for him leaving Twitch, that much has been confirmed himself.
Click to expand...
Also his response of "no wrongdoing was acknowledged" does not deny what he is accused of. The only thing I can think of is that he didn't know it was a minor. Also, it don't make sense to talk to a minor in the way he is accused of on twitch itself when no doubt a platform like Twitch would have access to all your personal messages. Who knows.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom