Dr. Disrespect permanently banned from Twitch
- Thread starter G-MAN2004
- Start date
It's amazing how he keeps getting these phone messages delivering devastating news at the exact time he is streaming. He's either bull'ing or whoever is sending these emails/messages is a great troll and wants to see his reaction live.
Last edited:
People who are relevant... dont yo mean people who have money to gain?
Evidence proving this is the case?
As all we have seen is an ex member of staff speculating on this is the reason for his removal.
Except thats not the case.
If the doc was undertaking the actions you just said such as;
Twitch have a legal responsibility to report that to the relevant authorities for them to investigate any potential harm as a result on the platform.
So yeah the actions do sound unreasonable to those wishing to burn at the stake with zero evidence apart from whispers.
We have some circumstantial evidence and armchair
If he's under NDA he likely can't respond to the accusations directly depending on how it's worded.
I have zero faith in Twitch staff or ex-staff to be honest about situations or to know the entirety of it. I'm no fan of Doc but I am fed up of these witch hunts online based on he said.. they didn't respond = guilty.
I have zero faith in Twitch staff or ex-staff to be honest about situations or to know the entirety of it. I'm no fan of Doc but I am fed up of these witch hunts online based on he said.. they didn't respond = guilty.
What was that chuk, can I crop 3 words from your posts and make up a false reply too.
Last edited:
I don’t think any context is lost by my selective quote. And nothing in the rest of your post disputes what I said. I would argue the rest of your post supports what I said.
Everything you’ve listed is at best (with a sprinkle of me being charitable) classed as circumstantial evidence.
And you are analysing his response to fit your confirmation bias.
Last edited:
There is no evidence outside of arm waving of someone who used to be employed at a company, that is using this information to gain followers and money through releasing - nothing substantial or evidently true.
I suspect what happened is Twitch obtained some details of these alleged messages or other actions and deemed him to be in breach of his contract. They then fired him, to which he counter claimed that that action wasn't within the scope of the terms of his contract with them for them to do that.
Eg, contract states we will terminate if convicted of xyz. His messages may exist and be sexual, but he hasn't been convicted, so they terminated his contract unlawfully and were liable to payment of damages (ie the contact in full).
The question I ask is did any settlement agreement include any clause about Twitch having to keep quiet about any such messages that may exist? Would this even be lawful / would they have a duty to report to the authorities? In turn, disrepcts part of any NDA is not to discuss anything to do with the settlement and with twitch dropping the ball.
Eg, contract states we will terminate if convicted of xyz. His messages may exist and be sexual, but he hasn't been convicted, so they terminated his contract unlawfully and were liable to payment of damages (ie the contact in full).
The question I ask is did any settlement agreement include any clause about Twitch having to keep quiet about any such messages that may exist? Would this even be lawful / would they have a duty to report to the authorities? In turn, disrepcts part of any NDA is not to discuss anything to do with the settlement and with twitch dropping the ball.
Last edited:
The rest of a sentence can be considered important. I personally think its straight up lying if you delete 90% of a message just to make a false reply then insist that your false reply was honest.
Soldato
I'm not really following this, because I don't really care that much about streamers. However, I thought he was found not guilty as such, and hence got a settlement. So why was he fired? (Perhaps COYS comment clears it up?)
Last edited:
His statement the other day 'I didn’t do anything wrong, all this has been probed and settled, nothing illegal, no wrongdoing was found, and I was paid' just relates to the settlement with Twitch, not the allegations. It is quite clever actually.
And him saying 'I was paid' just means that Titch were found in breach of his contract and settled (for the reason I speculated), not that any innocence to any crimes is to be inferred by that, as his statement could imply he is asserting.
Haha very funny.
Now formulate an actual reply to the points I’ve raised.
Since you said my reply is false I’m assuming you are arguing that the things you’ve posted are not classed as circumstantial evidence. So go on explain why they aren’t.
It was settled out of court. Twitch paid his contract in full. No parties admit to any wrongdoing and there is an NDA on the settlement. I think that’s all the key points from the lawsuit.
There is a reason he has completely ignored my response, easy to see why.Haha very funny.
Now formulate an actual reply to the points I’ve raised.
Since you said my reply is false I’m assuming you are arguing that the things you’ve posted are not classed as circumstantial evidence. So go on explain why they aren’t.
You actually pressed enter on that.
1) Two Twitch employees of the relevant time, with job titles that are relevant to being credible.
2) Nothing changed about the allegations of sexting a minor and wanting to meet up for sex at twitchcon and you're flipping from...
It's enlightening spending time to reply to you.
Still whispers, I dont see any evidence.
I could provide whispers about numerous business', does it mean its true? Nope until you have evidence to confirm.
Do you know how a justice process works?
Nothing has been confirmed thats the actual case either. So all you are doing is showing that you hear a rumour, believe rumour and full charge ahead with rumour. great job...
Talk about flipping all you want, nothing incorrect with what I have written, its just you dont like it, wah wah wah.
Its not illegal to speak to a child and at this moment in time with the current facts to the situation which really have not changed in the past couple of months. Twitch have not done anything wrong apart from potential breaking the terms of their payout deal to the Doc.
I can see why you're getting mixed up, this isn't about the legality of speaking to children.
It's about is there anything wrong with SEXTING A MINOR and WANTING TO HAVE SEX WITH THEM AT TWITCHCON.
I am of the opinion that it's not a good idea to keep someone as part of your business who is doing that. And the responses of Docs business partners make sense if the allegations are factual.
Other opinions such as yours may differ.
It's about is there anything wrong with SEXTING A MINOR and WANTING TO HAVE SEX WITH THEM AT TWITCHCON.
I am of the opinion that it's not a good idea to keep someone as part of your business who is doing that. And the responses of Docs business partners make sense if the allegations are factual.
Other opinions such as yours may differ.
I think you need to step back and actually read half the replies before coming out with such dribble.
No one, no one has said there is nothing wrong with sexting a minor etc.
We have said there is absolute zero evidence of such a thing taking place. Its been said by a person with a personal agenda for their own gain.
If you want to believe Chinese whispers and just follow the angry crowd, you do you lad.