Dr. Disrespect permanently banned from Twitch

You mean like our jimmy.
Well thats a reach and a half now isnt it.

One who was protected by numerous organisations and employers to go and undertake sexual assault against potential hundreds of children.
One has sent a message to message to someone underage (thats all we know).

Appalling comparison.
 
I fail to see how someone can be a confirmed pedo but not be convicted.
Well not every pedo gets found guilty in a court of law, mistakes are made in investigation materials, processing and so forth and sometimes a person who should be found guilty doesnt get found guilty. They should do, in an ideal world every person who should be convicted of a crime does get convicted and every innocent person doesnt, unfortunately though at times the opposites of those things happen.

Case in point for you... Jimmy Saville was never convicted. Plus as you rightly mention - miscarriages in justice. One can be known to be a perpetrator of a crime but not be convicted for it

Though to be clear on this, even if Dr Dis has leanings towards minors, I seem to recall thats not a crime anyway, doesnt something physical have to have happened or for it to involve images , for it to be a legal crime?
 
Last edited:
Surely if he did what he's been accused of that is not something that could have been settled outside of court, Twitch would have to report it to the authorities.

Is sexting someone under the age of consent (18 in the US) even illegal ? I read some upvoted comment on reddit (lol...) that in eye of the law he's done nothing wrong, it's just a very very bad look hence why people don't want to be associated with him now.
 
I could go and message a 14 year old this second, does that mean I should be "confirmed"?
I guess it would require more info, it would depend upon what it is you messaged, if it was a message to say how much you'd like to do X to them and included a photo of your junk in the messages, then yeah, I'd say that decent confirmation. If its just a message about Englands chances of winning Euro 2024 and should Foden be played centrally, then no clearly not
 
Is sexting someone under the age of consent (18 in the US) even illegal ? I read some upvoted comment on reddit (lol...) that in eye of the law he's done nothing wrong, it's just a very very bad look hence why people don't want to be associated with him now.
I think its only illegal if there are images involved, without images I think it has to go on to involve an actual physical act before it becomes a crime, but not sure if there are differences between the UK and the US. Countries have different rules for stuff of course, age of consent in Germany, Portugal and Italy is 14 for example (13 even in Italy providing that the partner is under 19 - so could be a 13yr old and an 18yr old), so things are probably somewhat more of a muddy area in those nations. So in those nations you could legally engage in sexual activities with a 15 yr old but here you'd be a pedi for it. If you think about it, the whole thing is a very complex issue, even eras affect it, my other halves parents got together when she was 14 and he was 24, theyve been together for 68 years now.
 
Last edited:
Is there real evidence, i was falsely accused in the past by a dishonest teen who simply wanted to spite me
I havent seen any actual evidence anywhere, just accusations and assumptions at the moment. I guess if theres anything more concrete than that it will come out in time but even if it doesnt there is already damage done to his brand. Just look at the brand damage to Kevin Spacey for example.
 
then yeah, I'd say that decent confirmation.
Well yes, but that is also enough for it to become a conviction.
Same time, none of us know what was said.

But a previous employee says one thing, the internet hears this as 100% truth without evidence and then proceeds to plaster it across the internet...
Even if he was guilty, moving in such a manner will completely ruin the prosecution's chance of, a conviction.

Is there real evidence,
If he's done nothing wrong then he needs to get way better at PR because his tweet was the most guilty sounding thing ever lol
So thats a no then. Thanks.
 
Well yes, but that is also enough for it to become a conviction.
Same time, none of us know what was said.

But a previous employee says one thing, the internet hears this as 100% truth without evidence and then proceeds to plaster it across the internet...
Even if he was guilty, moving in such a manner will completely ruin the prosecution's chance of, a conviction.



So thats a no then. Thanks.

None of the allegations claim anything illegal has occurred though, so what's he going to get prosecuted for ?
 
not every should-be conviction results in an actual conviction. Unfortunately.
But no conviction means that they should be left alone, try telling that to the internet warriors of today hell bent on cancelling and destroying all lives attached.
But I do agree though, it is a massive failing of criminal justice and prosecution system.

None of the allegations claim anything illegal has occurred though, so what's he going to get prosecuted for ?
I believe the person who bought all this back up used the term "sexting", without providing additional context, evidence or anything else.
 
I believe the person who bought all this back up used the term "sexting", without providing additional context, evidence or anything else.

If you can answer if it's illegal or not that should clear up whether it should be public or not. His company didn't want to make the answers they got public. The public has had no say in any actions taken against him.

“We assumed his innocence and began speaking with parties involved. And in order to maintain our principles and standards as a studio and individuals, we needed to act,” reads the post from Midnight Society. “For this reason, we are terminating our relationship with Guy Beahm immediately.”
 
If you can answer if it's illegal or not that should clear up whether it should be public or not.
What are you asking that is illegal? As far as I am aware, there is not enough information out there to confirm any form of criminal activity.
Its not a crime to speak to a child, its not exactly moral depending on your age, context and more, but its not directly illegal.

As for the Midnight Society text, well they are doing their best to avoid the social justice warriors and cancel culture's unjustified anger and hatred.
 
Isn't it grooming though ?
How is it grooming?
Nothing has been confirmed as to what has been said, what has been sent from back or even if it turned sexual.

Its not illegal to speak to a child, which at this moment in time is all he has done.

So why are people, maybe yourself and others heading down the grooming, paedo route without evidence?
 
Crazy watching the end of that stream when he gets a text and the realisation of the consequences of his actions he must now face. Just like when it happened the first time round with the twitch ban.

He knows he's guilty of serious wrongdoing hence his demeanor on stream, his not so well constructed tweet all but confirmed that for us. I can't believe he actually tweeted out what he did.

Then add in all these big names banning him, twitch, discord and even his own games company when they found out the specifics.

Anyone with half a brain can add all that up and know the allegations have merit and extremely likely condemn him.
 
What are you asking that is illegal? As far as I am aware, there is not enough information out there to confirm any form of criminal activity.
Its not a crime to speak to a child, its not exactly moral depending on your age, context and more, but its not directly illegal.

As for the Midnight Society text, well they are doing their best to avoid the social justice warriors and cancel culture's unjustified anger and hatred.

With one hand you type about evidence and with the other you don't need any to blame *various labels* for not paying rent.

We have evidence to have opinions that don't suck. Events did happen. People who are relevant have spoken.

He's been fired twice behind closed doors and has no strong answer to Twitch employees stating it was because he was sexting and looking to have sex with a minor. It also looks like he'll stop streaming indefinitely. It also looks like a screenshot and internal Twitch case number has been privately shared.

The actions of everyone involved do not sound unreasonable in context of the allegations being true.
 
Back
Top Bottom