Most sense said in this thread so far...

How many hours on the road are spent by people driving under the limit compared to over the limit? Until you can answer that question, possibly also correlating the road types, saying over-the-limit drink driving is irrelevant because it only accounts for 10% of crashes is pointless. In other words, we need an indication of relative risk.
Some people being worse off despite being <= the legal limit is not a reason for saying that drinking and driving is bad outright (you didn't actually say that but the majority in this thread are).If only the human body in each individual person reacted the same to equal amounts of alcohol would I agree
This is why I won't even have one, why you don't even have one, I don't even trust the breathalisers if I was under the limit. (you should know).
All the stories you hear of accidents in Jersey? You know our certain friend who has inside information on the aftermath of these events how many of them where under the influence and/or speeding but it's never reported to the public.
I wonder how much of an effect this applies to statistics as well.
I understand though they have based the legal limit on an average, but it still doesn't mean people out there won't react more than another, that is my problem.
snipped
He'll be fine though, it's the driver inside the padded cage that'll die!I'll probably get a suspension for this, but I hope you get mowed down by a drink driver.
..twaddle..

Everything I have said is credible
Lol what?
More people have died "fighting" for us in the middle east this year than drink driving..
You gonna ban war too ?
Everything I have said is credible. Its easy to denounce it as rubbish if you have no argument to the contrary.
Lol what?
More people have died "fighting" for us in the middle east this year than drink driving..
You gonna ban war too ?
Everything I have said is credible. Its easy to denounce it as rubbish if you have no argument to the contrary.
Why?
Everything I have said is true.
Drink driving isnt the pure evil its made out to be, anyone that thinks so has been conditioned by goverment propaganda.
Take the drink out of the equation and people will still have accidents.
Drink driving accounts for less than 10% of all road fatalities.
Rougly 3500 fatalities a year, 336 caused by drink driving.
Hardly the demon its made out to be is it??
People need to keep things in perspective.. sure its a silly thing to do... but its just one factor in MANY. Look at the Passionford guy for instance... stupid people do stupid things, the drinking is just a tiny part of it.
I feel sorry for people that are so suggestable that they talk with such venom about this topic, when in reality its not that big a deal.
On the whole people are pretty sensible, and most serious drink driving incedents are with young people. Most of the older people are collared the morning after or coming home from a meal out with friends having had too large a glass of wine for instance.
In addition, Drink driving is perfectly legal. The only illegal part is driving whilst over the prescribed limit... So I think people need to be more specific when using this phrase, as I would imagine probably 98% of people have drink driven at some point even if its just a pint.
There is nothing wrong with having a pint and driving, I dont understand all the crybabies and do gooders saying its drink OR drive, when the law clearly states you are allowed to do both, perfectly legally.
Really what it boils down to has nothing to do with alcohol.. its stupidity. The people that get into a car after some pills and booze, are the sorts of people that would quite easily put other peoples lives in danger when they are sober...