Soldato
what is inappropriate about the measure, yes, needs to be updated as the cost of living projections change,
but otherwise ability to pay is encapsulated as minimum income the household is expected to have considering state allowances - unsurprisingly, there is method in the madness - jeez.
Martin Lewis (he's becoming like trump) puts out similar rhetoric, maybe he could explain details.
ie.
It doesnt make sense when if your in a band C or above your automatically excluded, they say its impossible to be in fuel poverty
So a disabled pensioner on basic state pension receiving lots of allowances who we know would me massively struggling would be in fuel poverty in a band D or worse, but not in a band C or better.
Seeing as the C and D are somewhat arbitrary and a bit of opinion (from surveys I have seen) then clearly that is not a good measure, and yet its black and white per the definition.
The old measure was terrible as well, 10% of income spent on fuel would be getting close to our house being in fuel poverty with income over £100k.
This is always the problem with these sorts of metric, they rarely make sense as they assume everyone is the same.
Pre rises it would probably have not been terrible, but right now its clearly daft.
When you design measures you should test them properly, clearly no one thought to check it would cope with unexpected price rises.
These measure (both of above) are useful if you consider the trend, but are useless for anything else.