Soldato
It's probably more if you really looked into it. Tax, NI, tax on tax etc etci guess at least 50% of your wages is taken from you, with vat, ni, duty etc
It's probably more if you really looked into it. Tax, NI, tax on tax etc etci guess at least 50% of your wages is taken from you, with vat, ni, duty etc
And then gets "fleeced" significantly worse during winter?
So lets say he drops his DD down from £226 to ~£100 to cover summer usage for 8 months from now until November. He now has to cover almost £2k worth of winter usage in 4 months, so his DD will go up to £478/month. Now if he's sensible and puts that extra £125/month into a savings account then sure, not an issue, but it's still another thing to have to keep on top of. The net result after 12 months is exactly the same (other than who earns the £2 in interest on that money), but for most people, having a constant slightly higher bill is going to be a lot easier to manage than suddenly having to deal with a bill increasing by 500%.
And then gets "fleeced" significantly worse during winter?
So lets say he drops his DD down from £226 to ~£100 to cover summer usage for 8 months from now until November. He now has to cover almost £2k worth of winter usage in 4 months, so his DD will go up to £478/month. Now if he's sensible and puts that extra £125/month into a savings account then sure, not an issue, but it's still another thing to have to keep on top of. The net result after 12 months is exactly the same (other than who earns the £2 in interest on that money), but for most people, having a constant slightly higher bill is going to be a lot easier to manage than suddenly having to deal with a bill increasing by 500%.
That is the point. Ultimately what this means is "protected by the government, paid for by the people". That turned out great in 2008 as well, for the business owners. A top up meter is the physical manifestation of the company holding credit. With the prolific installation of smart meters that can take readings everyday they could very easily promote monthly billing of actual usage but you have to bend over backwards and dance on a broomstick to do this. If its going to be protected by the government and paid for by everyone then it should not be allowed under any circumstances where the companies can just lose £200m of customer credit and expect other energy users to pay the bill.
if your electric and heating/hotwater are separate then you can put electric as whole amount DD and not get fleeced.And then gets "fleeced" significantly worse during winter?
if your electric and heating/hotwater are separate then you can put electric as whole amount DD and not get fleeced.
most people probably use less electric in the winter as they won't have fans blowing air around, and your fridge/freezer won't be turning on as often etc
unless your crazy using electric heaters instead of radiators
ahh yea lights... I usually sit with black out curtains drawn in the summer and a light on anyway because the suns too bright, or in the evening not bright enough.Most peoples electric is slightly higher in the winter, but its far less volatile than gas.
Generally more lighting, leaning towards more cooked food etc
Its very much lifestyle dependant however in regards how volatile ones own usage will vary.
Electric demand is normally higher in winter than summer. More artificial lighting, home more often, central heating pumps etc etc.
But again, a lot of (not 100% admittedly) was caused by the governments price cap.
Few of these businesses had any issues until the energy prices went crazy. At that point the survivors are mainly those with old legacy ways of working, longer term contracting etc
These same businesses were often towards the top end of the price comparison charts, and losing more and more customers each year.
Now dont get me wrong, I think the industry as a whole was/is a mess. But you cant blame the companies only when they were literally being forced to sell gas and electric below the price it was costing them to buy it.
How many businesses would last long in any field forced to do that....
The main problem remains that the cap is fixed for too long and cannot react to an adverse market fast enough.
Long term fixed contracts were also fine when the market prices were pretty darn stable and predictable, they cant really function when its not.
Go back 20-30 years and virtually no one had a fixed price, they basically didnt exist. We now think of them as the normal for a savvy consumer. I suspect they will become fairly rare again as companies will be pricing them very highly due to risk.
prices weren't fluctuating 20-30 years ago , we didn't have non-flexible wind-power generation without a flexible generation component, just the miners, whilst at work.The main problem remains that the cap is fixed for too long and cannot react to an adverse market fast enough.
Long term fixed contracts were also fine when the market prices were pretty darn stable and predictable, they cant really function when its not.
Go back 20-30 years and virtually no one had a fixed price, they basically didnt exist. We now think of them as the normal for a savvy consumer. I suspect they will become fairly rare again as companies will be pricing them very highly due to risk.
I'd be interested to see some figures relating to customer bases of these businesses, as you've suggested fixed pricing tends to be associated with the more savvy customer that shops around for the best prices. So it would be logical to assume that most customers moving around and end up on new entrants to the market would be on a fixed pricing? If this is the case why would the price cap being slow to adjust vs market conditions affect a company whose bulk of the customers are on 1year+ fixes?
This is the issue.
If your well off monthly/quarterly in arrears is fine.
If your living more hand to mouth the temptation is always there to just make it up next month which if course will never happen. Approaching winter and bills going up 300% when you were struggling when bills were cheap.
But as ever we are looking at the symptoms and not the causes.
Yet we are still taxed less than most other EU nations, including all of the big ones, France, Germany, Spain, Italy etc. It’s a lot less than France.
I'd be interested to see some figures relating to customer bases of these businesses, as you've suggested fixed pricing tends to be associated with the more savvy customer that shops around for the best prices. So it would be logical to assume that most customers moving around and end up on new entrants to the market would be on a fixed pricing? If this is the case why would the price cap being slow to adjust vs market conditions affect a company whose bulk of the customers are on 1year+ fixes?
prices weren't fluctuating 20-30 years ago , we didn't have non-flexible wind-power generation without a flexible generation component, just the miners, whilst at work.
(obviously) reduction of cap cycle to 3 months may accompany october rise, but industry&consumer needs some price stability, otherwise economy would have inefficiency of results of continuous changes (imagine if that wasn't true for ... buying an airline ticket, iron ore, wheat , pint of milk ....)
Not all customers will have fixed at the same time, so there will be a constant churn of e.g. 8.3% of customers renewing every month.
You're also mistakenly assuming that most customers are "savvy".
Cost of living in France is a lot cheaper though (a quick Google suggests 10%) and Germans on average earn more money than us to make up for the tax.
Chapter 3: Prosumer engagement
3.1. Levels of consumer churn and influencing factors One of the metrics used to assess churn is how often customers choose to switch suppliers. Relatively speaking, energy has one of the highest rates of switching. On average, there are ~500,000 switches per month or ~20% of contracts in the household markets per annum (switching broadband provider, for example, is much lower at ~5%). However, as Clementine Cowton (Octopus Energy) points out “switching does not indicate customer happiness, rather unhappiness”.