Gerrard is better than Lampard for me, always has been, always played in a worse team, maybe bar 08/09 which Torres spent most of it injured so less people to assist too
Not arsed arguing with you though, you believe that all you want.
Yes, I can believe what I want and you can believe what you want, thats fine. But that ISN'T what you said, you said specifically he IS better BECAUSE one particularly season blows away anything Lampard has done.
You picked his best season and claimed Lampard has never matched it, if that is the entire basis(and the only reason you've said) that Gerrard is better than Lampard, you ARE wrong because your reasoning IS wrong. Lampard hasn't failed to scored 10 goals in the league for 9 years in a row, Lampard has only scored 10 or more 3 times in the past 9 years.
Gerrards best year in the league was 16 goals 9 assists, lampards is 22 goals 14 assists, Lampard has matched or beaten Gerrards best year in the league 3 times.
People really need to work out the difference between claiming something like Gerrard is better, and claiming it BASED on a specific argument which can(and in this case has) been proven incorrect.
Say, you think Gerrard is better because he's always played for a worse team , because he does more for the team, because he's taller, whatever, but the only reasoning you gave was incorrect by every measure. So the argument becomes what exactly are you basing Gerrard being better on, scoring more, no, assisting more, no.
Since 02/03 I believe Gerrard has scored 138 goals, Lampard has scored 189 or almost 40% more. Its rare that players even in different clubs are designated as "better" in a given role when the other player has scored and assisted dramatically more in the same period.