Something no one seems to have mentioned, which I thought would be all over the press, was out best two chances can from long ball football
One uber long pass to Nasri, and Fabregas's world class ball into Arshavin, which was long ball ish.
Its simply not true we played better against Chelsea though, we played a different team with a different style. they ALLOWED us to dominate the possesion, as that encouraged us forward and caused Song, amongst others, to venture further forward than they should have.
We didn't dominate their midfield, runs rings around their midfield or win the ball off their midfield, at all. When they lost the ball in an attack they simply retreated and allowed us to get within 30 yards before winning the ball back.
We didn't contest the midfield better, they simply decided not to fight us there.
AS I've said, another goal yesterday wouldn't have done anything, we'd have had to score, what 6-7 extra goals across the 4 games simply to draw these games, its conceding thats been our problem, not goal scoring.
EDIT:- Just checked across the 4 games we'd have needed 8 goals more simply to draw level, which is over 10% more goals scored so far this season, thats 10% more than both Utd and Chelsea also. We'd have needed to score 12 more goals to win all 4 games, thats 20% more goals scored this season.
Thats ludicrous, RVP would NOT have yielded us 8 goals in 4 games, nor 12 goals, no striker in the world would have made that amount of difference. However, had we conceded 8 less goals, we'd have drawn all 4 games, however we'd still have conceded more than both Utd and Chelsea, not that many more though.
The problem is goals conceded, this is the second season we're neck a neck with both of them for scoring, and yet have conceded massively more. We added Arshavin last year when we were scoring fine and conceding left right and centre, he scored 6 and made entirely no difference to the team with those 6 goals. Had we added a keeper and DM last year or summer, or a couple weeks ago, we could completely turn the team around into a cup and title winning side.
I really can't see how anyone can look at our scoring record and think its a problem, and see our conceded stats for a few years and not see the clear difference between us and the top sides.
Think of it this way, if Chelsea hadn't been able to score against us so damn easily, their tactic of sitting back in their own half and hitting us on the counter wouldn't have worked. They would have had to push forwards further, leaving a less solid defence, making it easier for us to attack. Its our very vunerability in defence that let them sit back so much to completely nulify our offence. A stronger defence leads to an easier time for our offence. Just like a strong offence that keeps the ball more, helps our defence, you need both working to be a strong team, one clearly isn't, its not our offence.