F1 2009 Season discussion/development thread

I wouldn't be surprised If Audi was one of the 3 potential buyers.

Honda pull out of F1, Audi who have developed the R15 to replace the R10 have all of a sudden pulled out of ALMS.

Some Lamborghini engines would be also nice. :p
 
Does anyone know what McLaren & Ferrari were spending per year? interested to know. You'd think Honda would have more strength to oversee any hardship times with hundreds of thousands of Honda cars on the road + whatever else Honda make! :p

How/Where is the money raised for the Ferrari team come from? 100% from Ferrari themselves or privateering/outsourcing?
 
Im absolutely gutted by the Honda withdrawl and really hope that the team gets bought by someone, as the new car is likely to be pretty special with Brawn at the design and developement stage

Button had an awful season no doubt about it - Barrichello didnt have a much better one (GB GP where he scored the majority of his points was hte main difference), but I still think Button deserves a really decent car (which he has never really had)

i dont think the car will be any better than this year to be honest
if it was im sure they wouldnt be selling
 
if no one is there there wont be no money to share lol

As far as I'm aware the teams get nothing from the circuits. This was a big issue a few years ago because the teams hid all their equipment on race weekends so even if you got a pitlane walkround ticket there was nothing to see.

The teams don't care about keeping the race going public happy because they don't get any money from it.

They really couldn't care less if the fans turn up or not. Compare that to Cart which used to be a whole lot more accesable to the fans, even the drivers.

F1 has been stuck up it's own bottom for far too long.

I've been to many GP's and only twice have I ever known drivers to come and meet the fans and mingle. Johnny Herbet once came to show off on colin mcrae rally simulator on the ford stand and montoya at spain to sign a few autographs.

Bernie pulled a master stroke with BBC, convincing them that the contract was up for grabs when the reality is even with the hamilton factor ITV wanted out.
 
F1 just seems to be a Black Hole as far as money goes. The teams pay huge amounts to take part. The tracks have to pay huge amounts to be raced at. TV companies pay huge amounts to film + show it to the world. Is it all going in Bernie's pocket or maybe in Max Mosley's so he can afford a lawyer to get him out of somewhat interesting situations.

I really can't see why it has to be like this, is there something I am overlooking?
 
F1 just seems to be a Black Hole as far as money goes. The teams pay huge amounts to take part. The tracks have to pay huge amounts to be raced at. TV companies pay huge amounts to film + show it to the world. Is it all going in Bernie's pocket or maybe in Max Mosley's so he can afford a lawyer to get him out of somewhat interesting situations.

I really can't see why it has to be like this, is there something I am overlooking?
It would help if the teams had more of a share of the revenue. I know it has increased a small amount in the last year or so, but with general reductions in costs as well, it would help.
 
This doesn't look too good either..

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/formula_1/article5295904.ece

Two more teams possibly pulling the plug? And standard engines/transmission possibly being introduced in the future (that could at least make things a bit more competitive I suppose)....

I'd actually welcome a more level playing field so the skill of the driver is far more of an apparent, deciding factor when it comes to winning races. :) What happens as regards innovation/development on the "standard" kit though...?
 
Last edited:
Even when he did have a faster car he made a lot less mistakes than hamilton does and continues to make.

When he had the 2nd fastest car on the grid he drove just about faultless races.

Ive never said that the Button of 2005/6 wasnt any good. What I've said is that he has lost the will to win. This has happened over the last 2 years and at this point he cannot possibly be mentioned in the same breath as the leading runners. He is at the back of the grid for a reason...not by chance.

Of course hamilton is multi champion material, he's in the best car on the grid. Take him out and put any of 5 or 6 others in the car and they would be multi winners.

It doesnt quite work that way. If it did, then any team with the best car could get any F1 driver and make him world champion (- I think you previously claimed something like this). We know for a FACT that this isnt the case, as people like MS, Hamilton, Prost and Senna have made their team-mates look very slow in comparison.

A multiple World Champion operates on a totally different level to most other drivers and can generally wipe the floor with other drivers, in other (sometimes faster) cars.

To win a world championship, you need a competitive car (not necessarily the best car), a bit of luck, team support and an abundance of hunger and skill. If you have all these in place, then you will do well.

Yet you rate Massa as a driver that can be mentioned in the same breath as hamilton based on pre 2008????

You mis-read. I placed Kimi as a top driver, based on his pre-2008 performance. His 2008 performance was indifferent.

Massa is a driver who isnt naturally gifted, where he can get in a car and immediately go fast. He needs time to adapt. Time to adapt to a new car with new characteristics. He needs time to learn a new track. But, when he does learn, he is pretty special. He's not great at overtaking, but in terms of absolute speed, he is one of the best.

Is Button as good as hamilton, most likely not. Yet I still believe he would have won the title in a mclaren with half the aggro and mistakes.

I'm sure that if Button wanted to, he could've manouvered himself into a faster car for 2008. He didnt. He's happy picking up his monster salary and playing at the back of the field, out of the spotlight, getting beat by the old man of F1. Sorry man, I can see you like Button a lot, but you have to face facts - in 2006, he might've been world championship material, but in 2008, he got beat by his team mate and if he couldnt handle Barrichello, how do you expect him to have handled Hamilton, Alonso or Massa?
 
And taken from

http://timesonline.typepad.com/formula_one/2008/11/the-people-have.html

people have voted on who the best/worst drivers in 2008 were:


The masters
1. Fernando Alonso - 1,071.5
2. Lewis Hamilton - 1,061.5
3. Felipe Massa - 989

The mid-fielders
4. Robert Kubica - 912.5
5. Sebastian Vettel - 895
6. Kimi Räikkönen - 488.5
7. Nick Heidfeld - 217
8. Timo Glock - 208.5
9. Jarno Trulli - 194
10. Mark Webber - 179

The also-rans
11. Nico Rosberg - 102
12. Heikki Kovalainen - 88.5
13. Rubens Barrichello - 30.5
= Sebastian Bourdais - 30.5
15. Nelsinho Piquet - 24
16. Adrian Sutil - 18
17. Jenson Button - 16
18. Giancarlo Fisichella 12
19. David Coulthard - 9
20. Takuma Sato/Anthony Davidson - 2

22. Kazuki Nakajima - 1


Some people might argue that I made up those results myself, but Ive always stated that Alonso was the daddy of F1 (he was immense in 2007 and great in the last third of 2008, making his team-mate look very ordinary) and that Button is quite poor these days (bottom 5, apparently).

Apparently Barrichello and Heikki (12th and 13th, respectively) are about the same, in terms of performance, so comparing those 2 with their respective team-mates is a good comparison.

I 100% agree with the top6 listed in there.
 
Sorry man, I can see you like Button a lot, but you have to face facts -

Actually I detest Button.

The helmet in the signiture comes from when I used to post on granprix forums. I used to have just the JV and mansell helmets in my sig and someone got me the Button one as a joke after bashing him too much.

It's just become a quick way to skim to where I last posted. The helmets came from a game and I've been meaning to swap the button one out but haven't been bothered yet. Over time I've just become indifferent towards him. I think he gets a lot of bad press when most of F1 is the car. I don't believe anywhere was open to him for 2008 and with brawn onboard and a huge budget things looked good.
 
And taken from

http://timesonline.typepad.com/formula_one/2008/11/the-people-have.html

people have voted on who the best/worst drivers in 2008 were:.

So the people have spoken.

In 2000. The year MS delivered Ferrari's world title for what 20 odd years, the saviour, the Italian readers of F1 magazine voted JV as the driver of the year. JV therefore > MS even in an inferior car. ;)

Any list that has massa as the 3rd best driver on the grid clearly just needs petrol and a match.
 
The masters

1. Fernando Alonso - 1,071.5
2. Lewis Hamilton - 1,061.5​
That would tend to support Alonso's claim that McLaren favoured Hamilton last year.

I am sure that no factor other than their relative skill as a driver had any bearing on this result ;)
 
Last edited:
That would tend to support Alonso's claim that McLaren favoured Hamilton last year.

Of course they did.

When the team boss himself isnt speaking to a particular driver (ie. Alonso, since the Hungarian GP), that says it all really. However, despite all that, Alonso managed to match Hamilton's points total and finish a point off the WDC. I'd say he did pretty well.

It must be noted though that in the same car/team, Hamilton and Alonso finished on identical points. And even in readers' poll (above), Hamilton and Alonso finished on near identical points totals (1061.5 vs 1071.5).

From all this, we could say that Alonso and Hamilton, at this point in time, are evenly matched.
 
Any list that has massa as the 3rd best driver on the grid clearly just needs petrol and a match.

Massa's alright. He doesnt have natural ability (ie. get into a brand new car and go fast, immediately), but he works hard and with that graft, he grinds out results.

I feel he has steadily improved, year on year. Next year, he might take another step forward...who knows...
 
When the team boss himself isnt speaking to a particular driver (ie. Alonso, since the Hungarian GP), that says it all really.
Would this be after it was revealed that Alonso and fellow Spaniard Pedro de la Rosa had had access to Ferrari performance information via Mike Coughlan and Nigel Stepney? - http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/motorsport/formula_one/6995240.stm

Great driver or not, Alonso behaved like a spoiled brat last year and one has to have every sympathy for McLaren wanting to be rid of such a disruptive influence. He and Schumacher came out of the same mould.
 
So, reading that times article, it appears Thursday will be the day F1 Dies. Either the teams agree to a standard engine, and then all the car manufacturers quit, or Max forces the teams to have a standard engine, and all the car manufacturers quit...

Whats the point in giving the teams the option to have their say, if Max will then just force his ideas through anyway.
 
Back
Top Bottom