F1 2012 - Teams and Drivers - Who goes where?!

I'm quite positive Bernie, Max and probably Jean have a whole heap of history with Dave Richards and I'm pretty sure at least two of them really don't like him and quite possibly did everything they could to make sure his team and him weren't selected. Remember Dave Richards ran the WRC for a while along with Prodrive running the Subaru team.
 
It wasn't just Prodrive though. There were a number of big names who applied who weren't picked, like Lola.

To me at least, it appeared the FIA chose teams they could 'use'. It was a time when they were trying to force through a single engine supplier, and top teams were talking of a breakaway. They chose weak teams who would likely be on the FIAs side in a conflict, and only selected teams who were going to use the Cosworth engine, one of the suppliers in talks about a single engine.

However, when the breakaway idea cooled down, the single engine idea was canned, and a bunch of testing restrictions came in, the FIA were stuck with 3 news teams that were of little use to them, and have struggled to hold on to their places at the bottom of the grid.

If the FIA had not gone with the political choices and instead looked at proven successfull race teams then we could have had 3 far more solid and successful teams on the grid now.
 
To be fair, TL/Caterham have been very impressive. They've built their own car from scratch, now negotiated themselves a Renault engine and a Red Bull gearbox to go with it and are making good infrastructure plans to make themselves a low-midfield runner in the next year or two, moving up to top 10 within the next 5 years.

Virgin were only there because they had Branson to bankroll them. He obviously realised how much was involved in getting the team going, and with no real motoring-related business to promote, F1 was of no real interest to him it wasn't surprising he left at the first opportunity. The best thing Virgin did was to use CFD alone to build their car. This in turn let every other team know that the technology is good, but nowhere near advanced enough to be relied on to build a car in its entirety.

I will agree though that USF1 and Campos Meta/HRT are timewasters who only got the FIA nod because they were willing to tow the line as and when called to.

The shame of it all is that it's now too late for a team of good repute to gain the 12th grid spot as they've all been scared away by the FIA's hidden agenda (Prodrive) or don't have the funds necessary to compete (Dams, Lola, Arden).
 
Prodrive were the management team in charge of running BAR Honda. Dave Richards and the Honda exec's didn't see eye to eye when they were looking at buying the team.

Honda's management style just didn't mesh with F1 - every decision being made by a committee saw them go from 2nd in the WCC to pretty much last. Unfortunately, Honda employed someone from Prodrive who suddenly appeared to have no spine, so the collapse of the team continued. Good old Fry... :rolleyes:

sorry just catching up with this

Was it officially Prodrive - or did the management team work two jobs (I just dont recall the Prodrive name actually being used as such for the F1 team, until they actually wanted to buy it as themselves)

So even after Richards left (and Fry came in / more prominant) it was still a Prodrive outfit?

Personally thought Fry did a reasonable job, and it was the sponsorship collapse worldwide that killed Honda (that god awful "Earth" car :eek:) after tobacco sponsorship was banned

It wasn't just Prodrive though. There were a number of big names who applied who weren't picked, like Lola.

To me at least, it appeared the FIA chose teams they could 'use'. It was a time when they were trying to force through a single engine supplier, and top teams were talking of a breakaway. They chose weak teams who would likely be on the FIAs side in a conflict, and only selected teams who were going to use the Cosworth engine, one of the suppliers in talks about a single engine.

However, when the breakaway idea cooled down, the single engine idea was canned, and a bunch of testing restrictions came in, the FIA were stuck with 3 news teams that were of little use to them, and have struggled to hold on to their places at the bottom of the grid.

If the FIA had not gone with the political choices and instead looked at proven successfull race teams then we could have had 3 far more solid and successful teams on the grid now.

While I totally agree with your thoughts about "using" smaller teams - is Lola still the same team, or like Lotus is it just the name that remains?

(and not digging at Lola, but even if it is the same team Im not sure how much better they would be given their severe lack of current f1 experience, even at the time).

Apart from Prodrive, I dont really recall any teams wanting to enter that were huge current names this side of the Atlantic (in any formula)
 
Last edited:
Lola are still the same I think. They are a big name in terms of building cars, not actually racing them. They made the chassis that underpinned the Aston Martin LMP1 car, along with a lot of other current and past P1 and P2 cars. They have also done a lot of work in single seaters including CART, Formula 3 and A1GP.

As prospective teams go, they were far more credible than any of the 3 that were picked.


http://www.lolacars.com/race_cars_projects.asp

Infact, they build more race cars than pretty much anyone on the current F1 grid!
 
Lola is far to small to exist in modern F1,they just do not have the resources to sustain a prolonged tilt at F1.

But Campos, USF1 and Manor did?

I'm not saying Lola are some huge Ferrari rival, but when compared to who was actually chosen, there were some far more substantial teams in the list.
 
But Campos, USF1 and Manor did?

I'm not saying Lola are some huge Ferrari rival, but when compared to who was actually chosen, there were some far more substantial teams in the list.

Lola currently have 60% of the staff and technicians they had when the doomed Mastercard Lola was launched, the facilities are nowhere near now what they were then and minimum wage, low skilled Polish make up 40% of their labour force.
 
As prospective teams go, they were far more credible than any of the 3 that were picked.

Lola has tried F1 several times over the years, and they were never any good. The Mastercard Lola debacle of '97, the feeble heap they designed for Scuderia Italia in '93, several cars for Larrousse that only resulted in one podium finish over five seasons, a brief tie-up with the Embassy-Hill team while they got their own in-house car going, their solitary win with the car they designed for Honda (an overweight, overpowered monstrosity that took John Surtees to tame it) and their original entry with Bowmaker in '62 that lasted a year before being shut down.

They didn't deserve another shot, even if they had been capable of actually getting to the grid again which I seriously doubt.
 
Yeah, how did their plan fall apart?! :o:D Did they actually have a plan? Possibly one of the worst teams never to get into F1. No designs, no chassis, no wages for staff. Wasn't that the general gist of what happened?

I still want one of their toasters. I believe it's the only thing they actually produced other than bull****. :D
 
Reading up on them, they were actually sued by the FIA for not competing and banned from any FIA championship.
I vaguely recall that. Wasn't it because the FIA actually admitted them to F1 and then they crashed out.

I still want one of their toasters. I believe it's the only thing they actually produced other than bull****. :D
I've heard their toasters were rubbish. Made nothing other than hot air. ;)
 
It was a very strange situation - similar to what happened with the proposed move of the British GP to Donington. The guys putting forward the bid had no money themselves (in F1 terms) and it was all based on meeting certain agreements with certain sponsors etc. Having no capital to start designing a car with, or even to get someone else to build a car for you as HRT did, their plan completely fell apart as they met none of these agreements.

You really have to wonder what kind of due diligence checks the FIA undertook before allowing the teams in.

It was quite surprising as the men involved - Peter Windsor especially - is highly respected amongst the F1 teams.
 
It was a very strange situation - similar to what happened with the proposed move of the British GP to Donington. The guys putting forward the bid had no money themselves (in F1 terms) and it was all based on meeting certain agreements with certain sponsors etc. Having no capital to start designing a car with, or even to get someone else to build a car for you as HRT did, their plan completely fell apart as they met none of these agreements.
How HRT managed it is still amazing.

You really have to wonder what kind of due diligence checks the FIA undertook before allowing the teams in.
I think it was a case of "Are you with us or with the other F1 teams? Us? Ok, you're in!"

It was quite surprising as the men involved - Peter Windsor especially - is highly respected amongst the F1 teams.
Yep, he certainly ruined his copybook. I know James Allen took over as the press conference bloke as Windsor was obliged to stand down once USF1 was announced.
 
Jerome d'Ambrosio has been named as 3rd driver for Bad Lotus.

I'm glad he got something, but I fear third driver status is pretty much career over for most drivers that end there these days. Of all the drivers lost from the grid for the coming year, he's the one I'm most disappointed about - I thought he showed promise and real talent on many occasions.
 
Back
Top Bottom