Caporegime
Looking crudely at the side views, looks like where the driver sits has been moved way back in the car, with their head very close to centre point between the wheels. That should please Lewis.
Yeah, I read that wrong lol...Horner confirmed as going
lol I did at first as wellYeah, I read that wrong lol...
So did I. It’s tomorrow isn’t it, not tonight?
Apparently, questions about internal investigations are off limits.
Given he is attending, surely this shows the investigation probably does not have the legs to run the course?Apparently, questions about internal investigations are off limits.
I wouldnt be so sure; it will be business as usual all the way until it isn't. He hasn't been removed from duties so I'd expect him to do everything the same until he is kicked out.Given he is attending, surely this shows the investigation probably does not have the legs to run the course?
Not quite.I'd have thought that if the accusations didn't have some significant basis then there would have been a swift internal investigation to get rid of it and that would be that.
Not quite.
It is the most sensible thing to do that when a business receives these types of complaints, they go through an investigation and process to verify the concern before proceeding.
If the investigation confirmed that there is some form of wrong that has occurred, it is in their benefit to remove that employee immediately from such duties to minimise being the face of the company and show they have taken the investigation seriously.
Given he is attending the car launches, tells me the investigation has begun and it is not looking as serious as once reported.
Or maybe, its not even a CH problem and is general culture of the organisation.
Again no information has been released outside of controlling and coercive behaviour, really think about it, every and any company in the country could be guilty of that. Because business needs come before employee needs.
Or it could show they wish to maintain a sign of transparency and professionalism by following procedures.I think if it wasn't significant then they wouldn't have wanted the exposure & embarrasment.
Based on what? Rumours? Are you a teenager?I'm still going with he's out or a long shot he stays and there's some other changes in RB leadership.
Shall I make you a tin foil hat? Although sounds like you already got one.Even if it isn't significant, if RB didn't want him to be out, they'd have covered it up and moved on.
Or it could show they wish to maintain a sign of transparency and professionalism by following procedures.
Based on what? Rumours? Are you a teenager?
Shall I make you a tin foil hat? Although sounds like you already got one.
Thats a massive reach and disrespectful to 1000's of compliance individuals, managers and more across all industries.Most businesses don't manage to maintain transparency and professionalism, or follow procedures.
Ha. I think the compliance individuals will survive my views on corporate responsibility.Thats a massive reach and disrespectful to 1000's of compliance individuals, managers and more across all industries.
What I'm saying is your comment is beyond ridiculous, but if you just want to maintain a nonsense view, go ahead.Ha. I think the compliance individuals will survive my views on corporate responsibility.