All I'm saying is that when RBR return from their break, its like the other teams have stood still, while they have moved forward. Make of that what you will.
If it were me, I would certainly not take a genuine break for 2 weeks. There is no way that I would be taking US$400M+/year from sponsors, for us to lose the title, simply because we wanted to take a 2 week holiday. I would have skeleton crew working from home during the 2 weeks, so that when the factory doors open, everybody can hit the ground running (ie. not wasting time on meetings that could've been done during the 2 week break). But hey...that's me.
My feeling is that McLaren do shut down (properly) for 2 weeks.
McLaren are very proper in how they do things and if they make a promise on something, they are the sort of team who would keep to that promise...even if it means they lose to their rivals as a result. The best example I can think of is in 2008, when they had the best KERS system. In 2010, they decided not to use it, simply because of a gentleman's agreement.
Had it been RBR or Ferrari, with their ruthless competitive streak, I doubt they would've given up on using a device which they had pretty much perfected.
RBR and Ferrari must've thought all their Christmases had come at once, when McLaren gave their word not use KERS in 2010.
So you think McLaren's engineers sit at home for 2 weeks and think nothing about the car and projects they are working on? They all have to shut down the factory and emails etc.
Saying McLaren are very proper on how they do things did make me chuckle, spygate ring any bells? Not forgetting the lies in Australia...
FOTA agreed not to use KERS in 2010, but any other team could have broken that deal and gained from having KERS, so all the rest kept their promise as well not just McLaren.
Teams, whether in FOTA or not use the 2 week shutdown. Its the same as any other business. Easier to have all your staff out at the same time than have their holidays scattered all over the place.
did you attend any of the tests sparky? and who do you consider as the top 5 teams?
But it is my opinion that if any team is likely to abide by the ruling, it will be McLaren. RBR and Ferrari are the least likely due to their competitive nature (and the fact that they pulled out of some of the agreements during the Winter, regarding budgets - so they have a proven track record).
Firstly, with spygate, it is not completely clear on how many employees were involved in it and more importantly, how high up, this matter went. Were senior management complicit in taking information from Ferrari? Again, we shall never know the answer to this question. We can only guess. Your guess is as good as anybody elses.
McLaren (as was shown in 2009) had by far the best KERS implementation. Some races were being won mainly due to the KERS device. In some races, Hamilton was getting off the line, using KERS and was passing his rivals to take the lead on the first lap. Other teams like Ferrari knew the damage which Hamilton was doing, with the KERS device and this prompted other teams to invest in KERS. Even in the final race of 2009, no other team was able to get their KERS device working the way that McLaren had it working.
“FOTA’s drive has run its course”. It claimed it would continue to try to make the Resource Restriction Agreement “more effective and efficient” but added: “We must return to a situation where Formula 1 is really a test bed for advanced technological research, the results of which can be transferred to Granturismo cars.”
Are there really 300+ less cars in the carpark over the summer break
Top 5 i dont think there has been a massive shakeup of standings although only time will really tell.
McLaren's KERS was the best though.
Ferrari were still having problems with their unit.
When you have a device which is best in class, why would you decide to abandon it, unless it was declared illegal? Would RBR have done this? Personally, I think not.
With regards to FOTA:
according to this:
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2011/12/02/ferrari-confirms-departure-fota/
Ferrari left FOTA completely of their own accord because
I cant see any mention of RBR being the reason for them leaving. Reading between the lines I think that Ferrari want to do whatever it takes to win and do not want to be held back by FOTA.
It is interesting that the two teams have left at the same time, although Ferrari claims it was on the move first, citing lack of trust (with Red Bull’s spending) and paralysis at FOTA in terms of dealing with it.
I was so disappointed with McLaren for not turning up with KERS. What is this a gentlmens club.
See MSC and many other people/teams on what you need to do do to be great. Sod verbal agreements.
Are you confident that your team will be victorious again this year?
What is the mood in your team like right now?
They're too British
Apparently Lewis Hamilton has kept "a nice amount of fuel" in his McLaren during pre-season testing so as not to reveal its true performance to its rivals.
http://en.espnf1.com/mclaren/motorsport/story/72529.html?CMP=chrome
Difficult to really say what it means if you don't know what fuel other cars are running but interesting none the less.
I think this will be a very exciting season.