Just noticed the top score is on Windows 11 too!
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Nearly 10%. Well worth it as long as subs don't affect stability. I must have a look at that.Same cpu oc, same primary timings and frequency but only put the subs on auto:
To me, that's a notable delta and well worth extracting the performance out of the system you already have.
Same cpu oc, same primary timings and frequency but only put the subs on auto:
To me, that's a notable delta and well worth extracting the performance out of the system you already have.
Had a little go with my NAS which has a 4650G running stock which is about 4.3Ghz and has 64Gb CL22 ECC RAM @ 2933 and a 1080Ti just because I was testing GPU after a rebuild of air cooler, not stellar numbers as you might expect with less cache and slow RAM leading to poor latency ~48 and ~60 for the two scenarios
That is a noticeably drop in performance!
To be fair have the board set in 35w mode, so it might be capped but didn't appear to be, the performance is not a million miles away from a 3600 in the table above and the 4650 is a 3600 with less cache and in my case running on slow server RAM.
Here's my 9900k which is very dialed in as well:
Goes without saying, ADL absolutely crushes it with without timings tune. With tuned, it's a different level. Same mem kit btw. Just cfl has no "gears" and tops out higher.
That is not 'very' dialled in that is extremely dialled in! I can count on 1 hand the amount of people I've seen running 4400Hz C16! What RAM are you using, GSkill?Here's my 9900k which is very dialed in as well:.
https://www.overclockers.co.uk/team-group-8pack-ripped-edition-16gb-2x8gb-ddr4-pc4-28800c14-3600mhz-dual-channel-kit-black-my-001-8p.htmlThat is not 'very' dialled in that is extremely dialled in! I can count on 1 hand the amount of people I've seen running 4400Hz C16! What RAM are you using, GSkill?
Interesting. I've also found that I often get better results with lower speed but tighter timings memory then higher speed loser timing (both b die).https://www.overclockers.co.uk/team...3600mhz-dual-channel-kit-black-my-001-8p.html
Got this when it came out a couple of years back. It was 100 back then lol
Interesting. I've also found that I often get better results with lower speed but tighter timings memory then higher speed loser timing (both b die).
If loved to see the difference between running your memory tuned and at the stock 3600 c14 (or even 3600 c16 for more representative speeds). All other things being equal.
We're back to that IPC word. Instructions-per-cycle. Nice but not in any way precise as what we really want is performance while running task X which is pretty different. Let's call it ipcX. Problem is that a CPU (or maybe we should say system as memory etc. plays a huge role) which is very good at ipcX may not be as good at ipcY (that is performance while running task Y), or ipcZ.I did wonder what crack you guys you were smoking if you thought a 3700x comes close to a 5600x LOL if this game is really as single threaded as you say it is.
Something phucky with this game and the huge disparity in results too.
Crap Benchmark, thanks for the effort though OP.
I mean the CPU hitters like Tomb Raider show the IPC advantage of Zen 3.