• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

*** Far Cry 2 1680 x 1050 max settings Top List ***

QX9770 @4Ghz

GTX280 SLI

Capture-5.jpg
 
ZoomZ said:
I will post up a bigger pic tonight 4 ya :)

BTW: its 67.54 in dx10 and 72.81 in dx9
Click to expand...

Ok cool I will update it now.

I sent my 4870x2 back since my 280 felt smoother even at lower fps :p (damn microstuttering!).

Updated dx9 and dx10 scores from me since im now on vista 64 :)

fc2dx9maxje7.png


fc2dx10maxcp6.png


q9550 @ 4000mhz > GTX 280 @ 700/1190/1500
 
I would like to see w3bbo at similiar clock speeds as fornowagan, I know it's not quite ceterus parabus but interesting to see a 4870x2 just as good or better than a solution which costs nearly twice as much (280 SLI) motherboard costs aside.
 
rafster said:
I would like to see w3bbo at similiar clock speeds as fornowagan, I know it's not quite ceterus parabus but interesting to see a 4870x2 just as good or better than a solution which costs nearly twice as much (280 SLI) motherboard costs aside.
Click to expand...

fornowagain previously posted a result with cpu @ 4Ghz of 79.xx.
 
I will take my place back now thank you.
With new hotfix drivers
[email protected] (tried 3.6 was slower) 4870x2 800/1000
Vista 64



probably by next update will lose 3rd place, wont bother with DX10 as that is dominated by GTX280s.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom