ElRazur said:You know........hmmm
In that case, do you wanna bring the camcorder along?
No thanks, seems like Penski has a gang of guys waiting for you.
![Wink ;) ;)](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/wink.gif)
ElRazur said:You know........hmmm
In that case, do you wanna bring the camcorder along?
penski said:There is no sarcasm in that post.
I'm a bit far from Soho and I have a girlfriend. Thanks for the offer though.
I know a few guys in your neck of the woods who may be more your type.
I'll pass them your contact details
*n
ElRazur said:Fellaz please let us talk about these things as i dont agree with some of them like :
12. Don't force her to do anything she's not comfortable with.
16. DON'T pressure her to do anything she isnt READY to do. When she is ready, she will let you know.
Perhaps people should learn to communicate, and then we wouldn't have the need for these useless chain emailswoodsy2k said:Perhaps someone could write one of those for the girls to read?![]()
Doesn't need the washing up need doing or something?Lostkat said:Perhaps people should learn to communicate, and then we wouldn't have the need for these useless chain emails![]()
dmpoole said:Am I missing something here?
Do you think its alright to force and pressure women?
Lostkat said:Perhaps people should learn to communicate, and then we wouldn't have the need for these useless chain emails
>When a guy calls u
>he wants to be with you
>
>When a guy is quiet,
>He's listening to you...
>
>When a guy is not arguing,
>He realizes he's wrong
>
>When a guy says, "I'm fine, " after a few minutes,
>he means it
>
>When a guy stares at you,
>he wishes you would care about him and wonders if you do?
>
>When you're laying your head on a guy's chest
>he has the world
>
>When a guy calls you everyday
>he is in love
>
>When a (good) guy say he loves you
>he means it
>
>When a guy says he can't live without you
>he's with you till your done
>
>When a guy says, "I miss you, "
>he misses you more than you could have ever missed him or anything else
The #1 rule when communicating a guy is: say it out loud! I tell ya, some women seem to expect that we can read mind or make something out of subtle ambiguous hints. Well, if we are blessed with those abilities, we would all be working in a casino nowLostkat said:Perhaps people should learn to communicate, and then we wouldn't have the need for these useless chain emails![]()
TooNice said:The #1 rule when communicating a guy is: say it out loud! I tell ya, some women seem to expect that we can read mind or make something out of subtle ambibuous hints. Well, if we are blessed with those abilities, we would all be working in a casino now![]()
megakid said:I got a few of these in another FWD email but it contained some mans ones too:
Someone please fix these![]()
>When a guy calls u
he wants to shag you
When a guy is quiet,
he wants to shag you
When a guy is not arguing,
he wants to shag you
When a guy says, "I'm fine, " after a few minutes,
he wants to shag you
When a guy stares at you,
he wants to shag you
When you're laying your head on a guy's chest
he wants to shag you, or is shagging you
When a guy calls you everyday
he wants to shag you
When a (good) guy say he loves you
he wants to shag you
When a guy says he can't live without you
he wants to shag you for another week
When a guy says, "I miss you, "
run out of bog roll.
Not really, and that's not the point I'm making anyway. They're generalisations. I'm not an object, I'm me and I have my own personality. I am intelligent and have thoughts and feelings. Unless you get to know me, a set of dopey instructions from an email won't show you how to treat me.woodsy2k said:I totally agree. But you got to admit that isnt goin to happen in a flash, perhaps it might help some people?
Infact i totally agree with some of the points in the OP. Dont you?![]()
Oooh, I learnt that a long time agoTooNice said:The #1 rule when communicating a guy is: say it out loud! I tell ya, some women seem to expect that we can read mind or make something out of subtle ambibuous hints. Well, if we are blessed with those abilities, we would all be working in a casino now![]()
Lostkat said:Not really, and that's not the point I'm making anyway. They're generalisations. I'm not an object, I'm me and I have my own personality. I am intelligent and have thoughts and feelings. Unless you get to know me, a set of dopey instructions from an email won't show you how to treat me.
I'm not a model number and make, so why should my boyfriend need a set of instructions to tell him how to deal with me? All that I ask of him is that he cares enough to get to know me (via the magic of communication etc.) so that he knows how to treat me without having to read this sort of crap. Funnily enough, I do the same with him and we've been getting on great for 4 years.
.
I am not going to argue about you specifically. But generalisations probably derives from some fairly universal truth that applies to most of the population. An example would be, most guys would probably not be very thrilled with going out with a woman who is visibily overweight in their eye. Likewise, most women would not be too thrilled with guys shorter than they are. There -are- exceptions to those rules but a rule only need to work for a majority (we can fit in the exception later on). Since there is not overly much we can do with our appearance (depending on the aspect), the emphasis for those rules are shifted to personalities, which may appear easier to work with. But it is also more difficult to accept, and easier to deny (the "I am me" reply). While some of those models/ideas may come out thin air (or a single individuals experience, observations), I do think that there are guidelines that work out for a bigger percentage of the population than the percentage of the population who would accept them. i.e. Most people would probably, like you, say they are unique and it doesn't apply to them. Yet in reality, a good model would probably work for more than half the population. Well, I guess that's what psychologist do. They put out models and pits them against each other. There are some interesting reads on human behaviourLostkat said:Not really, and that's not the point I'm making anyway. They're generalisations. I'm not an object, I'm me and I have my own personality. I am intelligent and have thoughts and feelings. Unless you get to know me, a set of dopey instructions from an email won't show you how to treat me.
Then perhaps these set of "guidelines" would work for the first stage of the relationship until you actually took the time and effort to get to know one-another? If I was going out with someone for a long time who was still getting things wrong because they couldn't be bothered to get to know me, then I'd be wasting my time.TooNice said:I am not going to argue about you specifically. But generalisations probably derives from some fairly universal truth that applies to most of the population. An example would be, most guys would probably not be very thrilled with going out with a woman who is visibily overweight in their eye. Likewise, most women would not be too thrilled with guys shorter than they are. There -are- exceptions to those rules but a rule only need to work for a majority (we can fit in the exception later on). Since there is not overly much we can do with our appearance (depending on the aspect), the emphasis for those rules are shifted to personalities, which may appear easier to work with. But it is also more difficult to accept, and easier than deny (the "I am me" reply). While some of those models/ideas may come out thin air (or a single individuals experience, observations), I do think that there are guidelines that work out for a bigger percentage of the population than the percentage of the population who would accept them. i.e. Most people would probably, like you, say they are unique and it doesn't apply to them. Yet in reality, a good model would probably work for more than half the population. Well, I guess that's what psychologist do. They put out models and pits them against each other. There are some interesting reads on human behaviour![]()